Proof of active cannabis use comparing 11‐hydroxy‐∆9‐tetrahydrocannabinol with 11‐nor‐9‐carboxy‐tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations
Thomas Franz, Gisela Skopp, Gerlinde Schwarz, Frank Mußhoff
Abstract
Thomas Franz, Gisela Skopp, Gerlinde Schwarz, Frank Mußhoff
Abstract
Testing hair for cannabis use has increasingly been scrutinised due to exposure to second-hand smoke or environmental contamination. Confirmation of drug use involving detection of metabolites such as 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) and 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-OH) having very rarely been considered. We developed a new, simplified procedure with regard to expenditure of time and material to determine delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, qualitatively), as well as THC-OH and THC-COOH (quantitatively) from 587 hair samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) which was compared to hitherto established methods (n = 3). Compared to conventional methanolic extraction alkaline dissolution resulted in higher concentrations for THC-OH. Concentrations determined from specimens ranged from 0.01 to 18.7 ng THC/mg hair, 0.05-37.6 pg THC-OH/mg hair, and from 0.1 to 54.3 pg THC-COOH/mg hair. THC was detectable in 70.4% samples along with both metabolites from more than half of these samples. In 12.9% of THC-positive cases, neither THC-OH nor THC-COOH were present. In 8.9% of THC-negative cases, it was possible to detect metabolites either alone or in combination. THC-OH could more frequently be detected than THC-COOH and appeared to be less susceptible to cosmetic treatment. In summary, THC-OH turned out to be a further suitable marker to prove cannabis use. Determination of both metabolites is recommended to unequivocally differentiate consumption from external exposure or contamination.
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Testing hair for cannabis use has increasingly been scrutinised due to exposure to second-hand smoke or environmental contamination. Confirmation of drug use involving detection of metabolites such as 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) and 11-hydroxy-delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-OH) having very rarely been considered. We developed a new, simplified procedure with regard to expenditure of time and material to determine delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, qualitatively), as well as THC-OH and THC-COOH (quantitatively) from 587 hair samples by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) which was compared to hitherto established methods (n = 3). Compared to conventional methanolic extraction alkaline dissolution resulted in higher concentrations for THC-OH. Concentrations determined from specimens ranged from 0.01 to 18.7 ng THC/mg hair, 0.05-37.6 pg THC-OH/mg hair, and from 0.1 to 54.3 pg THC-COOH/mg hair. THC was detectable in 70.4% samples along with both metabolites from more than half of these samples. In 12.9% of THC-positive cases, neither THC-OH nor THC-COOH were present. In 8.9% of THC-negative cases, it was possible to detect metabolites either alone or in combination. THC-OH could more frequently be detected than THC-COOH and appeared to be less susceptible to cosmetic treatment. In summary, THC-OH turned out to be a further suitable marker to prove cannabis use. Determination of both metabolites is recommended to unequivocally differentiate consumption from external exposure or contamination.
Key concepts: Tetrahydrocannabinol, Dronabinol, Cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Chemistry, Cannabidiol, Pharmacology, Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol