2018•Oncology LettersOpen access

miR‑224/miR‑141 ratio as a novel diagnostic biomarker in renal cell carcinoma

Xuanyu Chen, Ning Lou, Anming Ruan, Bin Qiu, Yunqin Yan, Xuegang Wang, Quansheng Du, Hailong Ruan, Weiwei Han, Haibin Wei, Hongmei Yang, Xiaoping Zhang

Open full text 22 citations

Abstract

Biomarkers to guide the clinical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not yet routinely available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been demonstrated to serve as biomarkers for a number of types of cancer. Based on a previous study by this group, we hypothesize that several highly differentially expressed miRNAs may serve as tissue and plasma biomarkers in patients with RCC. The expression levels of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141 were analyzed in tissue samples from the same cohort of 78 patients with RCC, in paired pre‑ and post‑operative plasma samples from 66 patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and in 67 healthy controls by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy associated with the expression of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141. ROC curves revealed that the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) of tissue miR‑210, miR‑224, the ratio of miR‑210/miR‑141 (miR210/141), miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR224/141) and miR‑210x miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR210x224/141) in ccRCC was 0.8329, 0.8511, 0.9412, 0.9898 and 0.9771, respectively. Notably, miR224/141 demonstrated the highest accuracy among these miRNAs for discriminating ccRCC tissues from normal tissues, with a sensitivity of 97.06% and a specificity of 98.53%. The expression levels of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were significantly increased in patients compared with healthy control patients, and were reduced postoperatively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were 0.6775 (89.55% sensitivity and 48.48% specificity) and 0.6056 (88.06% sensitivity and 40.91% specificity), respectively. The present study indicated that the tissue miR‑224/miR‑141 ratio is a potentially powerful tool for detecting ccRCC. However, plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 may not be associated with diagnosis of ccRCC.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Biomarkers to guide the clinical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not yet routinely available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been demonstrated to serve as biomarkers for a number of types of cancer. Based on a previous study by this group, we hypothesize that several highly differentially expressed miRNAs may serve as tissue and plasma biomarkers in patients with RCC. The expression levels of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141 were analyzed in tissue samples from the same cohort of 78 patients with RCC, in paired pre‑ and post‑operative plasma samples from 66 patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and in 67 healthy controls by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy associated with the expression of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141. ROC curves revealed that the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) of tissue miR‑210, miR‑224, the ratio of miR‑210/miR‑141 (miR210/141), miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR224/141) and miR‑210x miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR210x224/141) in ccRCC was 0.8329, 0.8511, 0.9412, 0.9898 and 0.9771, respectively. Notably, miR224/141 demonstrated the highest accuracy among these miRNAs for discriminating ccRCC tissues from normal tissues, with a sensitivity of 97.06% and a specificity of 98.53%. The expression levels of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were significantly increased in patients compared with healthy control patients, and were reduced postoperatively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were 0.6775 (89.55% sensitivity and 48.48% specificity) and 0.6056 (88.06% sensitivity and 40.91% specificity), respectively. The present study indicated that the tissue miR‑224/miR‑141 ratio is a potentially powerful tool for detecting ccRCC. However, plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 may not be associated with diagnosis of ccRCC.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Biomarkers to guide the clinical treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are not yet routinely available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) have been demonstrated to serve as biomarkers for a number of types of cancer. Based on a previous study by this group, we hypothesize that several highly differentially expressed miRNAs may serve as tissue and plasma biomarkers in patients with RCC. The expression levels of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141 were analyzed in tissue samples from the same cohort of 78 patients with RCC, in paired pre‑ and post‑operative plasma samples from 66 patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and in 67 healthy controls by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy associated with the expression of miR‑210, miR‑224 and miR‑141. ROC curves revealed that the diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve) of tissue miR‑210, miR‑224, the ratio of miR‑210/miR‑141 (miR210/141), miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR224/141) and miR‑210x miR‑224/miR‑141 (miR210x224/141) in ccRCC was 0.8329, 0.8511, 0.9412, 0.9898 and 0.9771, respectively. Notably, miR224/141 demonstrated the highest accuracy among these miRNAs for discriminating ccRCC tissues from normal tissues, with a sensitivity of 97.06% and a specificity of 98.53%. The expression levels of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were significantly increased in patients compared with healthy control patients, and were reduced postoperatively (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 were 0.6775 (89.55% sensitivity and 48.48% specificity) and 0.6056 (88.06% sensitivity and 40.91% specificity), respectively. The present study indicated that the tissue miR‑224/miR‑141 ratio is a potentially powerful tool for detecting ccRCC. However, plasma miR‑210 and miR‑224 may not be associated with diagnosis of ccRCC.

Key concepts: Oncogene, Renal cell carcinoma, Biomarker, microRNA, Molecular medicine, Receiver operating characteristic, Internal medicine, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
miR‑224/miR‑141 ratio as a novel diagnostic biomarker in renal cell carcinoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens