2018IFCEE 2018Requires access

Evaluation of Water Vapor Sorption and Electrical Conductivity Methods to Determine Bentonite Content of a Soil-Bentonite Barrier

Idil Deniz Akin, Jiannan Chen, Craig H. Benson, William J. Likos

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Two alternative methods were evaluated to measure bentonite content in soil-bentonite mixtures: (1) the water vapor sorption (WVS) method; and (2) the electrical conductivity (EC) method. The WVS method is a new technique developed for this study; the EC method was developed previously and modified in this study. Soil-bentonite mixtures blended with a pug-mill to have 5–6% bentonite content were sampled from three different locations of an engineered barrier. Samples of the base soil used for the barrier and the bentonite were also obtained. Calibration curves were created in the laboratory using base soil and bentonite collected from the field to determine the bentonite contents of samples of the field mixture. Bentonite contents determined from the field-mixed samples were compared to bentonite contents computed from scale records maintained during construction of the engineered barrier. Mixtures prepared in the laboratory and mixtures sampled in the field were treated chemically and physically to eliminate the influence of the initial distribution of bound cations on the test outcome and to amplify the sensitivity of the testing methods to bentonite content. The WVS and EC methods have linear correlations with bentonite content and can be used to determine the bentonite content of field mixtures accurately. However, physical and chemical treatments must be applied for accurate determination of bentonite content.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two alternative methods were evaluated to measure bentonite content in soil-bentonite mixtures: (1) the water vapor sorption (WVS) method; and (2) the electrical conductivity (EC) method. The WVS method is a new technique developed for this study; the EC method was developed previously and modified in this study. Soil-bentonite mixtures blended with a pug-mill to have 5–6% bentonite content were sampled from three different locations of an engineered barrier. Samples of the base soil used for the barrier and the bentonite were also obtained. Calibration curves were created in the laboratory using base soil and bentonite collected from the field to determine the bentonite contents of samples of the field mixture. Bentonite contents determined from the field-mixed samples were compared to bentonite contents computed from scale records maintained during construction of the engineered barrier. Mixtures prepared in the laboratory and mixtures sampled in the field were treated chemically and physically to eliminate the influence of the initial distribution of bound cations on the test outcome and to amplify the sensitivity of the testing methods to bentonite content. The WVS and EC methods have linear correlations with bentonite content and can be used to determine the bentonite content of field mixtures accurately. However, physical and chemical treatments must be applied for accurate determination of bentonite content.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two alternative methods were evaluated to measure bentonite content in soil-bentonite mixtures: (1) the water vapor sorption (WVS) method; and (2) the electrical conductivity (EC) method. The WVS method is a new technique developed for this study; the EC method was developed previously and modified in this study. Soil-bentonite mixtures blended with a pug-mill to have 5–6% bentonite content were sampled from three different locations of an engineered barrier. Samples of the base soil used for the barrier and the bentonite were also obtained. Calibration curves were created in the laboratory using base soil and bentonite collected from the field to determine the bentonite contents of samples of the field mixture. Bentonite contents determined from the field-mixed samples were compared to bentonite contents computed from scale records maintained during construction of the engineered barrier. Mixtures prepared in the laboratory and mixtures sampled in the field were treated chemically and physically to eliminate the influence of the initial distribution of bound cations on the test outcome and to amplify the sensitivity of the testing methods to bentonite content. The WVS and EC methods have linear correlations with bentonite content and can be used to determine the bentonite content of field mixtures accurately. However, physical and chemical treatments must be applied for accurate determination of bentonite content.

Key concepts: Bentonite, Sorption, Water vapor, Environmental chemistry, Electrical resistivity and conductivity, Soil water, Environmental science, Water content

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Water Vapor Sorption and Electrical Conductivity Methods to Determine Bentonite Content of a Soil-Bentonite Barrier — Research Paper | ScholarLens