Empirical Pseudopotential Modeling of Superlattices
Andrew P. Ongstad, Michael L. Tilton, Gregory C. Dente
Abstract
Andrew P. Ongstad, Michael L. Tilton, Gregory C. Dente
Abstract
For several years, we have been accurately calculating the electronic structure of superlattices using a solution technique based on the Empirical Pseudopotential Method (EOM). In our method for forming the superlattice pseudopotential, the critical assumption is that the heterointerface charges are redistributed, making each constituent layer in the superlattice as bulk-like as possible. Here, we demonstrate that our technique for forming the superlattice pseudopotential is fundamentally different from the atomistic pseudopotential approaches that use a superposition of atomic pseudopotentials to represent the superlattice. We then present several applications of our method to InAsGaSb Type-II superlattices and, where possible, we compare our results to those calculated with an effective mass method, as well as to atomistic EPM methods. In all of these comparisons, our method provides excellent agreement with the measured data.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
For several years, we have been accurately calculating the electronic structure of superlattices using a solution technique based on the Empirical Pseudopotential Method (EOM). In our method for forming the superlattice pseudopotential, the critical assumption is that the heterointerface charges are redistributed, making each constituent layer in the superlattice as bulk-like as possible. Here, we demonstrate that our technique for forming the superlattice pseudopotential is fundamentally different from the atomistic pseudopotential approaches that use a superposition of atomic pseudopotentials to represent the superlattice. We then present several applications of our method to InAsGaSb Type-II superlattices and, where possible, we compare our results to those calculated with an effective mass method, as well as to atomistic EPM methods. In all of these comparisons, our method provides excellent agreement with the measured data.
Key concepts: Superlattice, Pseudopotential, Superposition principle, Condensed matter physics, Statistical physics, Materials science, Physics, Chemistry