2018Andrology and Genital SurgeryOpen access

A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT REGIMENS WITH THE USE OF ABIRATERONE ACETATE AND DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER

A.V. Kondrashina, Leonid Mikhailovich Rapoport, Eugene A. Bezrukov, Roman B. Sukhanov, German E. Krupinov

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction. In recent years, due to the progressive increase in the prevalence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the question of the sequence of prescription drugs is becoming more acute. Objective is to compare the effectiveness of various regimens of treatment of CRPC with the use of abirateron acetate and docetaxel. Materials and methods. The analysis included 83 patients with CRPC, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the sequence of appointment of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel. Results. Differences in the level of 2-year survival were statistically insignificant (73,2 % in the 1st group, 69 % in the 2nd group), and 3-year survival significantly differed: in the 1st group – 29,3 %, in the 2nd group – 16,7 % (p <0.05). Due to the short duration of the analysis, 5-year survival was not evaluated. The average value of overall survival in the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate was 32 months, with the reverse regimen (abiraterone acetate, then docetaxel) – 27 months (p = 0.01). Conclusion . The scheme with the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate is more effective from the point of view of affect on overall and 3-year survival in patients with CRPC.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction. In recent years, due to the progressive increase in the prevalence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the question of the sequence of prescription drugs is becoming more acute. Objective is to compare the effectiveness of various regimens of treatment of CRPC with the use of abirateron acetate and docetaxel. Materials and methods. The analysis included 83 patients with CRPC, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the sequence of appointment of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel. Results. Differences in the level of 2-year survival were statistically insignificant (73,2 % in the 1st group, 69 % in the 2nd group), and 3-year survival significantly differed: in the 1st group – 29,3 %, in the 2nd group – 16,7 % (p <0.05). Due to the short duration of the analysis, 5-year survival was not evaluated. The average value of overall survival in the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate was 32 months, with the reverse regimen (abiraterone acetate, then docetaxel) – 27 months (p = 0.01). Conclusion . The scheme with the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate is more effective from the point of view of affect on overall and 3-year survival in patients with CRPC.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction. In recent years, due to the progressive increase in the prevalence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), the question of the sequence of prescription drugs is becoming more acute. Objective is to compare the effectiveness of various regimens of treatment of CRPC with the use of abirateron acetate and docetaxel. Materials and methods. The analysis included 83 patients with CRPC, which were divided into 2 groups depending on the sequence of appointment of abiraterone acetate and docetaxel. Results. Differences in the level of 2-year survival were statistically insignificant (73,2 % in the 1st group, 69 % in the 2nd group), and 3-year survival significantly differed: in the 1st group – 29,3 %, in the 2nd group – 16,7 % (p <0.05). Due to the short duration of the analysis, 5-year survival was not evaluated. The average value of overall survival in the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate was 32 months, with the reverse regimen (abiraterone acetate, then docetaxel) – 27 months (p = 0.01). Conclusion . The scheme with the appointment of the first docetaxel, then abiraterone acetate is more effective from the point of view of affect on overall and 3-year survival in patients with CRPC.

Key concepts: Docetaxel, Abiraterone acetate, Prostate cancer, Medicine, Regimen, Oncology, Internal medicine, Abiraterone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT REGIMENS WITH THE USE OF ABIRATERONE ACETATE AND DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH CASTRATION-RESISTANT PROSTATE CANCER — Research Paper | ScholarLens