2018회계학연구Requires access

Continuing Professional Education for Audit Partners and Audit Quality

Eugenia Y. Lee, Jong‐Hag Choi, Moon Ki Chung

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the effect of continuing professional education (CPE) for audit partners on audit quality. In Korea, as in many other countries, certified public accountants are required to attend at least 40 hours of CPE annually to perform external audits. However, the effect of CPE on audit quality is not clear and we are not aware of any prior studies that directly investigate such an effect. Using a unique dataset on the annual CPE hours of audit partners from 2006 to 2015, we fail to find evidence that greater CPE is significantly related to improved audit quality. Through several cross-sectional analyses, we fail to identify any specific circumstances in which greater CPE improves audit quality. Despite important empirical limitations, this study provides practical implications on the role of CPE in determining audit quality. The findings suggest that regulators, professional bodies, and academics need to pay attention to the issue and develop ways to improve the effectiveness of the CPE.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the effect of continuing professional education (CPE) for audit partners on audit quality. In Korea, as in many other countries, certified public accountants are required to attend at least 40 hours of CPE annually to perform external audits. However, the effect of CPE on audit quality is not clear and we are not aware of any prior studies that directly investigate such an effect. Using a unique dataset on the annual CPE hours of audit partners from 2006 to 2015, we fail to find evidence that greater CPE is significantly related to improved audit quality. Through several cross-sectional analyses, we fail to identify any specific circumstances in which greater CPE improves audit quality. Despite important empirical limitations, this study provides practical implications on the role of CPE in determining audit quality. The findings suggest that regulators, professional bodies, and academics need to pay attention to the issue and develop ways to improve the effectiveness of the CPE.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the effect of continuing professional education (CPE) for audit partners on audit quality. In Korea, as in many other countries, certified public accountants are required to attend at least 40 hours of CPE annually to perform external audits. However, the effect of CPE on audit quality is not clear and we are not aware of any prior studies that directly investigate such an effect. Using a unique dataset on the annual CPE hours of audit partners from 2006 to 2015, we fail to find evidence that greater CPE is significantly related to improved audit quality. Through several cross-sectional analyses, we fail to identify any specific circumstances in which greater CPE improves audit quality. Despite important empirical limitations, this study provides practical implications on the role of CPE in determining audit quality. The findings suggest that regulators, professional bodies, and academics need to pay attention to the issue and develop ways to improve the effectiveness of the CPE.

Key concepts: Audit, Quality audit, Certification, Accounting, Business, Quality (philosophy), Audit evidence, Joint audit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Continuing Professional Education for Audit Partners and Audit Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens