2018Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental SciencesOpen access

TO STUDY THE USEFULNESS OF SERUM AND ASCITIC FLUID C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) AND ASCITIC FLUID CHOLESTEROL LEVEL IN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT, NONMALIGNANT AND TUBERCULAR ASCITES

Mayank Mayank, B. P. Priyadarshi, Mahendra Singh, Ashok Kumar Verma, Tanu Midha

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUNDAscites is a common clinical problem.However, the capability to distinguish malignant from non-malignant and tubercular causes of ascites using available biochemical techniques would obviate many expensive and time-consuming diagnostic studies on patients presenting with ascites of unknown aetiology.Therefore, this study was planned to evaluate usefulness of serum & ascitic fluid C-Reactive Protein (CRP), SAAG and ascitic fluid cholesterol level in diagnosis of malignant, non-malignant and tubercular ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective observational study in 80 patients, those admitted and willing to give consent in the department of Medicine, LLR & Associated Hospitals, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur from December 2015 to October 2017.All patients underwent full investigations to make the diagnosis of ascites malignant (20) and nonmalignant (n=54)), tubercular (7) and nontubercular (47) groups.6 patients were excluded because the ascitic fluid analysis was suggestive of bacterial peritonitis.The data was processed in MS Excel and analysis was carried out using SPSS Ver.23. RESULTSWe found that in the non-malignant group mean value of ascitic fluid CRP was 0.29+0.12vs 3.16+1.42(mg/l) in malignant group, SAAG was 1.81+0.70vs 0.87+0.34(mg/l) in non-malignant vs malignant group.The mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.85 + 34.28 vs 6.7 + 2.5 in non-malignant group (p value <0.01) and the mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.80 + 34.28 vs 32.43 + 15.7 in tubercular group, so ascitic fluid cholesterol is highly specific (100%) and sensitive (65%) at cut off value of 100 mg/dl in differentiating benign and malignant causes of ascites. CONCLUSIONSAAG, Ascitic fluid CRP, and cholesterol having high specificity, can be used for differentiating between non-malignant and malignant ascites.It can also be used to differentiate tubercular ascites from malignant ascites.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUNDAscites is a common clinical problem.However, the capability to distinguish malignant from non-malignant and tubercular causes of ascites using available biochemical techniques would obviate many expensive and time-consuming diagnostic studies on patients presenting with ascites of unknown aetiology.Therefore, this study was planned to evaluate usefulness of serum & ascitic fluid C-Reactive Protein (CRP), SAAG and ascitic fluid cholesterol level in diagnosis of malignant, non-malignant and tubercular ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective observational study in 80 patients, those admitted and willing to give consent in the department of Medicine, LLR & Associated Hospitals, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur from December 2015 to October 2017.All patients underwent full investigations to make the diagnosis of ascites malignant (20) and nonmalignant (n=54)), tubercular (7) and nontubercular (47) groups.6 patients were excluded because the ascitic fluid analysis was suggestive of bacterial peritonitis.The data was processed in MS Excel and analysis was carried out using SPSS Ver.23. RESULTSWe found that in the non-malignant group mean value of ascitic fluid CRP was 0.29+0.12vs 3.16+1.42(mg/l) in malignant group, SAAG was 1.81+0.70vs 0.87+0.34(mg/l) in non-malignant vs malignant group.The mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.85 + 34.28 vs 6.7 + 2.5 in non-malignant group (p value <0.01) and the mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.80 + 34.28 vs 32.43 + 15.7 in tubercular group, so ascitic fluid cholesterol is highly specific (100%) and sensitive (65%) at cut off value of 100 mg/dl in differentiating benign and malignant causes of ascites. CONCLUSIONSAAG, Ascitic fluid CRP, and cholesterol having high specificity, can be used for differentiating between non-malignant and malignant ascites.It can also be used to differentiate tubercular ascites from malignant ascites.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUNDAscites is a common clinical problem.However, the capability to distinguish malignant from non-malignant and tubercular causes of ascites using available biochemical techniques would obviate many expensive and time-consuming diagnostic studies on patients presenting with ascites of unknown aetiology.Therefore, this study was planned to evaluate usefulness of serum & ascitic fluid C-Reactive Protein (CRP), SAAG and ascitic fluid cholesterol level in diagnosis of malignant, non-malignant and tubercular ascites. MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a prospective observational study in 80 patients, those admitted and willing to give consent in the department of Medicine, LLR & Associated Hospitals, GSVM Medical College, Kanpur from December 2015 to October 2017.All patients underwent full investigations to make the diagnosis of ascites malignant (20) and nonmalignant (n=54)), tubercular (7) and nontubercular (47) groups.6 patients were excluded because the ascitic fluid analysis was suggestive of bacterial peritonitis.The data was processed in MS Excel and analysis was carried out using SPSS Ver.23. RESULTSWe found that in the non-malignant group mean value of ascitic fluid CRP was 0.29+0.12vs 3.16+1.42(mg/l) in malignant group, SAAG was 1.81+0.70vs 0.87+0.34(mg/l) in non-malignant vs malignant group.The mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.85 + 34.28 vs 6.7 + 2.5 in non-malignant group (p value <0.01) and the mean value of ascitic fluid cholesterol in malignant group was 100.80 + 34.28 vs 32.43 + 15.7 in tubercular group, so ascitic fluid cholesterol is highly specific (100%) and sensitive (65%) at cut off value of 100 mg/dl in differentiating benign and malignant causes of ascites. CONCLUSIONSAAG, Ascitic fluid CRP, and cholesterol having high specificity, can be used for differentiating between non-malignant and malignant ascites.It can also be used to differentiate tubercular ascites from malignant ascites.

Key concepts: Ascitic fluid, Medicine, Ascites, Differential diagnosis, C-reactive protein, Pathology, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TO STUDY THE USEFULNESS OF SERUM AND ASCITIC FLUID C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP) AND ASCITIC FLUID CHOLESTEROL LEVEL IN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF MALIGNANT, NONMALIGNANT AND TUBERCULAR ASCITES — Research Paper | ScholarLens