2018Chemical Engineering & TechnologyOpen access

Comparative Evaluation of OpenFOAM® and ANSYS® Fluent for the Modeling of Annular Reactors

C. Ariza, Cintia Casado, Ruo‐Qian Wang, E. Eric Adams, Javier Marugán

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

Abstract A three‐dimensional numerical model was solved for a turbulent incompressible steady flow and the discrepancies and similarities between the software OpenFOAM® and ANSYS® Fluent on the flow modeling were analyzed. The evaluation was performed for the meshing, setup, and simulation step of the modeling process. Outcomes were contrasted with experimental data to validate the fluid flow obtained with both softwares. With this aim, an experimental pulse‐response technique was applied to obtain the residence time distribution (RTD) curve to be compared with the RTD curves achieved from the modeling. Additionally, images of the tracer transport in the experimental reactor were taken, showing good agreement with the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A three‐dimensional numerical model was solved for a turbulent incompressible steady flow and the discrepancies and similarities between the software OpenFOAM® and ANSYS® Fluent on the flow modeling were analyzed. The evaluation was performed for the meshing, setup, and simulation step of the modeling process. Outcomes were contrasted with experimental data to validate the fluid flow obtained with both softwares. With this aim, an experimental pulse‐response technique was applied to obtain the residence time distribution (RTD) curve to be compared with the RTD curves achieved from the modeling. Additionally, images of the tracer transport in the experimental reactor were taken, showing good agreement with the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A three‐dimensional numerical model was solved for a turbulent incompressible steady flow and the discrepancies and similarities between the software OpenFOAM® and ANSYS® Fluent on the flow modeling were analyzed. The evaluation was performed for the meshing, setup, and simulation step of the modeling process. Outcomes were contrasted with experimental data to validate the fluid flow obtained with both softwares. With this aim, an experimental pulse‐response technique was applied to obtain the residence time distribution (RTD) curve to be compared with the RTD curves achieved from the modeling. Additionally, images of the tracer transport in the experimental reactor were taken, showing good agreement with the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions.

Key concepts: Computational fluid dynamics, Residence time distribution, Fluent, Turbulence, Fluid dynamics, Flow (mathematics), Mechanics, Compressibility

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Evaluation of OpenFOAM® and ANSYS® Fluent for the Modeling of Annular Reactors — Research Paper | ScholarLens