2010Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée eBooksRequires access

Zadie Smith’s Autonomous Writing Commitments to E.M. Forster

Laurent Mellet

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Smith’s fiction seems to have followed some astonishing path from standard social commitment to the world to a more aesthetic and ideological commitment to Forster’s Edwardian Howards End. Does the rewriting of Forster’s novel in On Beauty stem from her initially more political writing? Beyond the structure, plot and characters revisited, the aesthetics of auto-referentiality informed by the philosophy of Zeno in White Teeth herald the autonomy of Smith’s writing in On Beauty—time and space are now interwoven in a new self-regulating frame allowing the past (and Howards End) to be actualised in the linguistic sense. And eventually, just as Forster claimed that speaking before thinking is creation’s motto, Smith’s novel disappears behind its model and the void on the page is nothing but evidence of her now purely aesthetic commitment to Forster’s own aesthetics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Smith’s fiction seems to have followed some astonishing path from standard social commitment to the world to a more aesthetic and ideological commitment to Forster’s Edwardian Howards End. Does the rewriting of Forster’s novel in On Beauty stem from her initially more political writing? Beyond the structure, plot and characters revisited, the aesthetics of auto-referentiality informed by the philosophy of Zeno in White Teeth herald the autonomy of Smith’s writing in On Beauty—time and space are now interwoven in a new self-regulating frame allowing the past (and Howards End) to be actualised in the linguistic sense. And eventually, just as Forster claimed that speaking before thinking is creation’s motto, Smith’s novel disappears behind its model and the void on the page is nothing but evidence of her now purely aesthetic commitment to Forster’s own aesthetics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Smith’s fiction seems to have followed some astonishing path from standard social commitment to the world to a more aesthetic and ideological commitment to Forster’s Edwardian Howards End. Does the rewriting of Forster’s novel in On Beauty stem from her initially more political writing? Beyond the structure, plot and characters revisited, the aesthetics of auto-referentiality informed by the philosophy of Zeno in White Teeth herald the autonomy of Smith’s writing in On Beauty—time and space are now interwoven in a new self-regulating frame allowing the past (and Howards End) to be actualised in the linguistic sense. And eventually, just as Forster claimed that speaking before thinking is creation’s motto, Smith’s novel disappears behind its model and the void on the page is nothing but evidence of her now purely aesthetic commitment to Forster’s own aesthetics.

Key concepts: Beauty, Nothing, Ideology, Aesthetics, Art, Autonomy, Politics, Plot (graphics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Zadie Smith’s Autonomous Writing Commitments to E.M. Forster — Research Paper | ScholarLens