2007Concurrences ReviewRequires access

Review of the EC margin of discretion: The CFI rules that when the Commission has a wide discretion, judicial review of the manner in which that discretion is exercised is confined mainly to establish that the decision is sufficiently motivated (Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies)

Jacques Derenne

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

CFI, 12 September 2007, Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies AE v. Commission, case T-68/03 Le Tribunal annule partiellement la decision rendue par la Commission en 2002 relative a certaines aides…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

CFI, 12 September 2007, Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies AE v. Commission, case T-68/03 Le Tribunal annule partiellement la decision rendue par la Commission en 2002 relative a certaines aides…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

CFI, 12 September 2007, Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies AE v. Commission, case T-68/03 Le Tribunal annule partiellement la decision rendue par la Commission en 2002 relative a certaines aides…

Key concepts: Discretion, Judicial discretion, Commission, Administrative discretion, Law, Political science, Margin (machine learning), Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review of the EC margin of discretion: The CFI rules that when the Commission has a wide discretion, judicial review of the manner in which that discretion is exercised is confined mainly to establish that the decision is sufficiently motivated (Olympiaki Aeroporia Ypiresies) — Research Paper | ScholarLens