Comparative study of Azotobacter with or without other fertilizers on growth and yield of wheat in Western hills of Nepal
Sanjay Mahato, Asmita Kafle
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sanjay Mahato, Asmita Kafle
Abstract
Open-access reader
A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the growth and yield of wheat (variety Gautam) at the premise of Lamjung Krishi Campus, Nepal during the winter season of 2016–17. A completely randomized design was chosen with seven treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, and T7) each replicated three times. The treatments were control (T1), 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 (T2), Azotobacter seed inoculated (T3), Azotobacter soil application (T4), Azotobacter + 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 (T5), Azotobacter + 10 t FYM ha−1 (T6), Azotobacter + 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 + 10 t FYM ha−1 (T7). Root length, root weight, shoot weight, plant height, panicle weight, grain weight, grain yield, total biomass, and biological yield were significantly affected by treatments. Inoculation of Azotobacter only increased 16.5%–19.42% grain yield over control i.e. non inoculated treatments while with other fertilizers increase was of range 19.42%–63.1%. The increase in yield was 23.3% with only chemical fertilizer NPK (T2) over control. So Azotobacter can be used as a biofertilizer for greater yield and the yield is highest with Azotobacter combined with farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizer (NPK).
OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the growth and yield of wheat (variety Gautam) at the premise of Lamjung Krishi Campus, Nepal during the winter season of 2016–17. A completely randomized design was chosen with seven treatments (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, and T7) each replicated three times. The treatments were control (T1), 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 (T2), Azotobacter seed inoculated (T3), Azotobacter soil application (T4), Azotobacter + 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 (T5), Azotobacter + 10 t FYM ha−1 (T6), Azotobacter + 120:80:80 kg NPK ha−1 + 10 t FYM ha−1 (T7). Root length, root weight, shoot weight, plant height, panicle weight, grain weight, grain yield, total biomass, and biological yield were significantly affected by treatments. Inoculation of Azotobacter only increased 16.5%–19.42% grain yield over control i.e. non inoculated treatments while with other fertilizers increase was of range 19.42%–63.1%. The increase in yield was 23.3% with only chemical fertilizer NPK (T2) over control. So Azotobacter can be used as a biofertilizer for greater yield and the yield is highest with Azotobacter combined with farmyard manure and inorganic fertilizer (NPK).
Key concepts: Azotobacter, Microbial inoculant, Biofertilizer, Panicle, Fertilizer, Agronomy, Inoculation, Yield (engineering)