2017ROSA POpen access

Safety Evaluation of Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Intersections

Joseph E. Hummer, Sathish Rao, Vhb

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersection and was conducted by the DCMF program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. RCUT is defined as a three-approach or four-approach intersection where minor street left-turn and through movements (if any) are rerouted to one-way downstream U-turn crossovers. RCUTs are also known as superstreets, J-turns, reduced conflict intersections, and synchronized streets. Previous research has shown that unsignalized RCUTs are generally safer than conventional options. However, there are no known studies specific to the safety of signalized RCUTs. The objective of this effort was to collect and analyze crash data to develop a crash modification factor (CMF) for signalized RCUTs.\n\n\nThis study collected and analyzed crash data before and after conversion of 11 intersections from conventional to RCUT design. The intersections were in suburban areas on four- or six-lane arterials. For most individual sites and groups of sites examined, odds ratio tests showed that there were high-quality comparison sites available, and regression to the mean was not an issue. The project team recommends a CMF of 0.85 for overall crashes and 0.78 for injury crashes for the conversion of a conventional intersection to an RCUT intersection.\n\n\nBased on those CMFs, the project team produced an estimated benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.6 to 1.0 when considering safety and operations or 2.6 to 1.0 considering safety only.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study evaluated restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersection and was conducted by the DCMF program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. RCUT is defined as a three-approach or four-approach intersection where minor street left-turn and through movements (if any) are rerouted to one-way downstream U-turn crossovers. RCUTs are also known as superstreets, J-turns, reduced conflict intersections, and synchronized streets. Previous research has shown that unsignalized RCUTs are generally safer than conventional options. However, there are no known studies specific to the safety of signalized RCUTs. The objective of this effort was to collect and analyze crash data to develop a crash modification factor (CMF) for signalized RCUTs.\n\n\nThis study collected and analyzed crash data before and after conversion of 11 intersections from conventional to RCUT design. The intersections were in suburban areas on four- or six-lane arterials. For most individual sites and groups of sites examined, odds ratio tests showed that there were high-quality comparison sites available, and regression to the mean was not an issue. The project team recommends a CMF of 0.85 for overall crashes and 0.78 for injury crashes for the conversion of a conventional intersection to an RCUT intersection.\n\n\nBased on those CMFs, the project team produced an estimated benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.6 to 1.0 when considering safety and operations or 2.6 to 1.0 considering safety only.\n

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study evaluated restricted crossing U-turn (RCUT) intersection and was conducted by the DCMF program for the Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study. RCUT is defined as a three-approach or four-approach intersection where minor street left-turn and through movements (if any) are rerouted to one-way downstream U-turn crossovers. RCUTs are also known as superstreets, J-turns, reduced conflict intersections, and synchronized streets. Previous research has shown that unsignalized RCUTs are generally safer than conventional options. However, there are no known studies specific to the safety of signalized RCUTs. The objective of this effort was to collect and analyze crash data to develop a crash modification factor (CMF) for signalized RCUTs.\n\n\nThis study collected and analyzed crash data before and after conversion of 11 intersections from conventional to RCUT design. The intersections were in suburban areas on four- or six-lane arterials. For most individual sites and groups of sites examined, odds ratio tests showed that there were high-quality comparison sites available, and regression to the mean was not an issue. The project team recommends a CMF of 0.85 for overall crashes and 0.78 for injury crashes for the conversion of a conventional intersection to an RCUT intersection.\n\n\nBased on those CMFs, the project team produced an estimated benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.6 to 1.0 when considering safety and operations or 2.6 to 1.0 considering safety only.\n

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Intersection (aeronautics), Computer science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety Evaluation of Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Intersections — Research Paper | ScholarLens