2018•Social Studies Research and PracticeRequires access

Dialogic pedagogy in the supervision of social studies student teachers

Alexander Cuenca

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Research reveals very little about how the supervision of social studies student teachers ought to be enacted. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Based on the broader arguments for the democratic purposes of social studies, the author argues for the development of the democratic capacities of teacher citizens by creating deliberative and dialogic spaces in social studies field-based teacher education. Findings Four conceptual dimensions of dialogic pedagogy in the supervision of social studies student teachers are explored: questioning, listening, negotiation, and self-critique. Originality/value Because supervision of student teachers is a pedagogical interaction, a pedagogy of social studies field-based teacher education must be grounded in dialogue and deliberation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose Research reveals very little about how the supervision of social studies student teachers ought to be enacted. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Based on the broader arguments for the democratic purposes of social studies, the author argues for the development of the democratic capacities of teacher citizens by creating deliberative and dialogic spaces in social studies field-based teacher education. Findings Four conceptual dimensions of dialogic pedagogy in the supervision of social studies student teachers are explored: questioning, listening, negotiation, and self-critique. Originality/value Because supervision of student teachers is a pedagogical interaction, a pedagogy of social studies field-based teacher education must be grounded in dialogue and deliberation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose Research reveals very little about how the supervision of social studies student teachers ought to be enacted. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Based on the broader arguments for the democratic purposes of social studies, the author argues for the development of the democratic capacities of teacher citizens by creating deliberative and dialogic spaces in social studies field-based teacher education. Findings Four conceptual dimensions of dialogic pedagogy in the supervision of social studies student teachers are explored: questioning, listening, negotiation, and self-critique. Originality/value Because supervision of student teachers is a pedagogical interaction, a pedagogy of social studies field-based teacher education must be grounded in dialogue and deliberation.

Key concepts: Dialogic, Pedagogy, Deliberation, Negotiation, Originality, Value (mathematics), Active listening, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dialogic pedagogy in the supervision of social studies student teachers — Research Paper | ScholarLens