2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Институционализм и современная кейнсианская гетеродоксия: методологический анализ

Tetiana Gaidai, Tetiana Gaidai

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A comparative methodological analysis of institutional economics and modern Keynesian heterodoxy from the point of view of positive (descriptive) methodology was conducted. Actualization of the newest heterodox streams of Keynesianism - Post-Keynesianism and new Keynesianism is given. The main trends of productive methodological impact of institutional economics on Keynesian heterodoxy are analyzed. On the example of their interaction it is shown that the main intent of heterogeneous trends in the structure of modern economic science lies in compensation of evident theoretical-methodological insufficiency of neoclassic mainstream on the basis of development of more realistic and productive alternatively competitive approaches in the sphere of economic methodology, normative and positive economics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comparative methodological analysis of institutional economics and modern Keynesian heterodoxy from the point of view of positive (descriptive) methodology was conducted. Actualization of the newest heterodox streams of Keynesianism - Post-Keynesianism and new Keynesianism is given. The main trends of productive methodological impact of institutional economics on Keynesian heterodoxy are analyzed. On the example of their interaction it is shown that the main intent of heterogeneous trends in the structure of modern economic science lies in compensation of evident theoretical-methodological insufficiency of neoclassic mainstream on the basis of development of more realistic and productive alternatively competitive approaches in the sphere of economic methodology, normative and positive economics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comparative methodological analysis of institutional economics and modern Keynesian heterodoxy from the point of view of positive (descriptive) methodology was conducted. Actualization of the newest heterodox streams of Keynesianism - Post-Keynesianism and new Keynesianism is given. The main trends of productive methodological impact of institutional economics on Keynesian heterodoxy are analyzed. On the example of their interaction it is shown that the main intent of heterogeneous trends in the structure of modern economic science lies in compensation of evident theoretical-methodological insufficiency of neoclassic mainstream on the basis of development of more realistic and productive alternatively competitive approaches in the sphere of economic methodology, normative and positive economics.

Key concepts: Heterodoxy, Mainstream economics, Heterodox economics, Economics, Normative, Mainstream, Orthodoxy, Positive economics

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Институционализм и современная кейнсианская гетеродоксия: методологический анализ — Research Paper | ScholarLens