2008eTheses of Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University (Maulana Malik Ibrahim State Islamic University)Open access

A study of hedging and flouting of conversational maxims in the movie of John Tucker Must Die

Akhmad Napis

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This study focuses on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims of conversational maxims spoken by the characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. Maxims are the rules of cooperative principle: Maxims of Quality, Maxims of Quantity, Maxims of Relevant, and Maxims of Manner. If these maxims are used in conversation, they can go smoothly, but when people make conversation they often break the maxims overtly (flouting the maxims) and sometimes break the maxims secretly (hedging the maxims). The characters (players) especially in movie often flout and hedge their conversation. Based on that background, the research about flouting and hedging maxims of conversations in the movie of John Tucker Must Die was conducted with the following problem: What maxims are flouted and hedged in John Tucker Must Die movie? \n \nThis research was conducted using descriptive qualitative method based on the theory known as Grice’s maxims. The data are in the form of conversation used by characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. \n \nData analysis revealed some findings covering the formulated research questions. The maxims could be flouted or hedged by all speakers. The maxims are flouted if the speaker breaks some maxims when using the utterance in the form of rhetorical strategies, namely: tautology, metaphor, overstatement, understatement, rhetorical question and irony. On the other hand, maxims are hedged when the information is not totally accurate or not clearly stated but seems informative, well founded and relevant. \n \nBased on the data analysis and findings, it is suggested to the readers try to obey the role of conversation that although it is very difficult to obey and use all of the maxims in the conversation. Especially in movie, to make their communication can go on smoothly players or character in the movie are ordered to obey the director’s command, and then the story can run properly. Besides, it is suggested to the next researchers to use other relevance theories in investigating the same area of the research briefly and clearly to find the best result of research, especially for other subject beside the movie.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study focuses on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims of conversational maxims spoken by the characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. Maxims are the rules of cooperative principle: Maxims of Quality, Maxims of Quantity, Maxims of Relevant, and Maxims of Manner. If these maxims are used in conversation, they can go smoothly, but when people make conversation they often break the maxims overtly (flouting the maxims) and sometimes break the maxims secretly (hedging the maxims). The characters (players) especially in movie often flout and hedge their conversation. Based on that background, the research about flouting and hedging maxims of conversations in the movie of John Tucker Must Die was conducted with the following problem: What maxims are flouted and hedged in John Tucker Must Die movie? \n \nThis research was conducted using descriptive qualitative method based on the theory known as Grice’s maxims. The data are in the form of conversation used by characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. \n \nData analysis revealed some findings covering the formulated research questions. The maxims could be flouted or hedged by all speakers. The maxims are flouted if the speaker breaks some maxims when using the utterance in the form of rhetorical strategies, namely: tautology, metaphor, overstatement, understatement, rhetorical question and irony. On the other hand, maxims are hedged when the information is not totally accurate or not clearly stated but seems informative, well founded and relevant. \n \nBased on the data analysis and findings, it is suggested to the readers try to obey the role of conversation that although it is very difficult to obey and use all of the maxims in the conversation. Especially in movie, to make their communication can go on smoothly players or character in the movie are ordered to obey the director’s command, and then the story can run properly. Besides, it is suggested to the next researchers to use other relevance theories in investigating the same area of the research briefly and clearly to find the best result of research, especially for other subject beside the movie.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study focuses on analyzing flouting and hedging maxims of conversational maxims spoken by the characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. Maxims are the rules of cooperative principle: Maxims of Quality, Maxims of Quantity, Maxims of Relevant, and Maxims of Manner. If these maxims are used in conversation, they can go smoothly, but when people make conversation they often break the maxims overtly (flouting the maxims) and sometimes break the maxims secretly (hedging the maxims). The characters (players) especially in movie often flout and hedge their conversation. Based on that background, the research about flouting and hedging maxims of conversations in the movie of John Tucker Must Die was conducted with the following problem: What maxims are flouted and hedged in John Tucker Must Die movie? \n \nThis research was conducted using descriptive qualitative method based on the theory known as Grice’s maxims. The data are in the form of conversation used by characters in the movie of John Tucker Must Die. \n \nData analysis revealed some findings covering the formulated research questions. The maxims could be flouted or hedged by all speakers. The maxims are flouted if the speaker breaks some maxims when using the utterance in the form of rhetorical strategies, namely: tautology, metaphor, overstatement, understatement, rhetorical question and irony. On the other hand, maxims are hedged when the information is not totally accurate or not clearly stated but seems informative, well founded and relevant. \n \nBased on the data analysis and findings, it is suggested to the readers try to obey the role of conversation that although it is very difficult to obey and use all of the maxims in the conversation. Especially in movie, to make their communication can go on smoothly players or character in the movie are ordered to obey the director’s command, and then the story can run properly. Besides, it is suggested to the next researchers to use other relevance theories in investigating the same area of the research briefly and clearly to find the best result of research, especially for other subject beside the movie.

Key concepts: Grice, Cooperative principle, Conversation, Tautology (logic), Politeness maxims, Metaphor, Utterance, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A study of hedging and flouting of conversational maxims in the movie of John Tucker Must Die — Research Paper | ScholarLens