Welfare-improving Consumption Tax in the Presence of a Wage Tax under Idiosyncratic Returns from Investment and Incomplete Markets
Hisahiro Naito
Abstract
Hisahiro Naito
Abstract
In a standard multiperiod model, consumption tax and wage tax are equivalent. I show that when a capital market is incomplete – in the sense that the rates of return from risky investments are idiosyncratic and there is no insurance for such idiosyncratic risk – the introduction of a consumption tax in the presence of a wage tax improves welfare. This holds true even in the presence of optimal or nonoptimal capital income taxes. In the general-equilibrium model, the optimal level of the consumption tax is determined to balance the benefits of the risk-sharing effect and the asset accumulation effect against the costs of postponing government revenue to later periods.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In a standard multiperiod model, consumption tax and wage tax are equivalent. I show that when a capital market is incomplete – in the sense that the rates of return from risky investments are idiosyncratic and there is no insurance for such idiosyncratic risk – the introduction of a consumption tax in the presence of a wage tax improves welfare. This holds true even in the presence of optimal or nonoptimal capital income taxes. In the general-equilibrium model, the optimal level of the consumption tax is determined to balance the benefits of the risk-sharing effect and the asset accumulation effect against the costs of postponing government revenue to later periods.
Key concepts: Economics, Consumption (sociology), Monetary economics, Welfare, Wage, Consumption tax, Investment (military), Labour economics