2014•Chapman University Digital Commons (Chapman University)Open access

2nd Place Research Paper: Effects of Cognitive Interventions on the Cognition of Patients Diagnosed With Dementia

Kiersten Kelly

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to test the hypothesis: If a patient diagnosed with dementia participates in a cognitive intervention, then they will develop fewer cognitive deficits than a patient diagnosed with dementia who does not participate in a cognitive intervention. Recent literature was systematically searched using several databases. A total of 20 empirical articles were included in this review. Inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of dementia for each participating patient. Each study includes an experimental group of patients who participated in a cognitive intervention and a control group of patients who did not participate in a cognitive intervention. Various types of cognitive interventions were tested during these studies. The cognitive abilities of all patients were tested prior to and at the conclusion of treatment. The cognitive changes experienced by patients who participated in the cognitive interventions were compared to the cognitive changes experienced by patients who did not participate the cognitive interventions. The findings of these studies varied in their relationship to the thesis hypothesis. Ten of these studies showed results that supported the thesis hypothesis, 7 studies refuted the thesis hypothesis, and 3 studies showed findings that both supported and refuted the thesis hypothesis. The variance of results can be explained by the differing cognitive functions of focus of each cognitive intervention. Some of these interventions proved to have greater benefits on the cognitive abilities of patients diagnosed with dementia than others.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this literature review was to test the hypothesis: If a patient diagnosed with dementia participates in a cognitive intervention, then they will develop fewer cognitive deficits than a patient diagnosed with dementia who does not participate in a cognitive intervention. Recent literature was systematically searched using several databases. A total of 20 empirical articles were included in this review. Inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of dementia for each participating patient. Each study includes an experimental group of patients who participated in a cognitive intervention and a control group of patients who did not participate in a cognitive intervention. Various types of cognitive interventions were tested during these studies. The cognitive abilities of all patients were tested prior to and at the conclusion of treatment. The cognitive changes experienced by patients who participated in the cognitive interventions were compared to the cognitive changes experienced by patients who did not participate the cognitive interventions. The findings of these studies varied in their relationship to the thesis hypothesis. Ten of these studies showed results that supported the thesis hypothesis, 7 studies refuted the thesis hypothesis, and 3 studies showed findings that both supported and refuted the thesis hypothesis. The variance of results can be explained by the differing cognitive functions of focus of each cognitive intervention. Some of these interventions proved to have greater benefits on the cognitive abilities of patients diagnosed with dementia than others.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this literature review was to test the hypothesis: If a patient diagnosed with dementia participates in a cognitive intervention, then they will develop fewer cognitive deficits than a patient diagnosed with dementia who does not participate in a cognitive intervention. Recent literature was systematically searched using several databases. A total of 20 empirical articles were included in this review. Inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of dementia for each participating patient. Each study includes an experimental group of patients who participated in a cognitive intervention and a control group of patients who did not participate in a cognitive intervention. Various types of cognitive interventions were tested during these studies. The cognitive abilities of all patients were tested prior to and at the conclusion of treatment. The cognitive changes experienced by patients who participated in the cognitive interventions were compared to the cognitive changes experienced by patients who did not participate the cognitive interventions. The findings of these studies varied in their relationship to the thesis hypothesis. Ten of these studies showed results that supported the thesis hypothesis, 7 studies refuted the thesis hypothesis, and 3 studies showed findings that both supported and refuted the thesis hypothesis. The variance of results can be explained by the differing cognitive functions of focus of each cognitive intervention. Some of these interventions proved to have greater benefits on the cognitive abilities of patients diagnosed with dementia than others.

Key concepts: Dementia, Cognition, Psychological intervention, Psychology, Cognitive psychology, Medicine, Clinical psychology, Developmental psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
2nd Place Research Paper: Effects of Cognitive Interventions on the Cognition of Patients Diagnosed With Dementia — Research Paper | ScholarLens