2017Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory MedicineRequires access

Prediction of haematocrit in dried blood spots from the measurement of haemoglobin using commercially available sodium lauryl sulphate

G.H. Richardson, David Marshall, BG Keevil

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

Background When preparing dried blood spots (DBSs), haematocrit (Hct) can affect the ability of the blood to spread through the filter paper, thus resulting in varying quantities of sample being measured when fixed subpunches of the DBSs are taken. It may be important to predict the sample Hct to correct volume differences. Methods Blood (10 µL) was applied to Perkin Elmer 226® paper. The samples ( n = 165) were allowed to dry for 24 h, and the entire blood spots were cut out. Subpunch analysis was also performed on blood spots prepared from 75 µL EDTA blood, taking 6 mm subpunches centrally and peripherally from the spots ( n = 59). The spots were eluted with 100 µL water, and a 10 µL aliquot of lysate was added to sulfolyser reagent (80 µL) in a microtitre plate. Hb was measured at 550 nm using an ELISA plate reader. DBS samples were compared against blood samples measured on a routine Sysmex XN-9000 analyser. Results The Passing and Bablock regression showed Hct (DBS-predicted) = 0.99 Hct (Sysmex) −0.02, R 2 = 0.87. Intra-assay imprecision measured at Hct values of 0.27, 0.40 and 0.52, gave CVs of 4.1%, 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Inter-assay imprecision showed CVs of 6.2%, 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively. DBS samples were stable for up to two days at 60℃, one month at room temperature and six months at 4℃. Conclusion This method provides a simple and fast estimation of predicted Hct in dried blood spots.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background When preparing dried blood spots (DBSs), haematocrit (Hct) can affect the ability of the blood to spread through the filter paper, thus resulting in varying quantities of sample being measured when fixed subpunches of the DBSs are taken. It may be important to predict the sample Hct to correct volume differences. Methods Blood (10 µL) was applied to Perkin Elmer 226® paper. The samples ( n = 165) were allowed to dry for 24 h, and the entire blood spots were cut out. Subpunch analysis was also performed on blood spots prepared from 75 µL EDTA blood, taking 6 mm subpunches centrally and peripherally from the spots ( n = 59). The spots were eluted with 100 µL water, and a 10 µL aliquot of lysate was added to sulfolyser reagent (80 µL) in a microtitre plate. Hb was measured at 550 nm using an ELISA plate reader. DBS samples were compared against blood samples measured on a routine Sysmex XN-9000 analyser. Results The Passing and Bablock regression showed Hct (DBS-predicted) = 0.99 Hct (Sysmex) −0.02, R 2 = 0.87. Intra-assay imprecision measured at Hct values of 0.27, 0.40 and 0.52, gave CVs of 4.1%, 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Inter-assay imprecision showed CVs of 6.2%, 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively. DBS samples were stable for up to two days at 60℃, one month at room temperature and six months at 4℃. Conclusion This method provides a simple and fast estimation of predicted Hct in dried blood spots.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background When preparing dried blood spots (DBSs), haematocrit (Hct) can affect the ability of the blood to spread through the filter paper, thus resulting in varying quantities of sample being measured when fixed subpunches of the DBSs are taken. It may be important to predict the sample Hct to correct volume differences. Methods Blood (10 µL) was applied to Perkin Elmer 226® paper. The samples ( n = 165) were allowed to dry for 24 h, and the entire blood spots were cut out. Subpunch analysis was also performed on blood spots prepared from 75 µL EDTA blood, taking 6 mm subpunches centrally and peripherally from the spots ( n = 59). The spots were eluted with 100 µL water, and a 10 µL aliquot of lysate was added to sulfolyser reagent (80 µL) in a microtitre plate. Hb was measured at 550 nm using an ELISA plate reader. DBS samples were compared against blood samples measured on a routine Sysmex XN-9000 analyser. Results The Passing and Bablock regression showed Hct (DBS-predicted) = 0.99 Hct (Sysmex) −0.02, R 2 = 0.87. Intra-assay imprecision measured at Hct values of 0.27, 0.40 and 0.52, gave CVs of 4.1%, 2.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Inter-assay imprecision showed CVs of 6.2%, 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively. DBS samples were stable for up to two days at 60℃, one month at room temperature and six months at 4℃. Conclusion This method provides a simple and fast estimation of predicted Hct in dried blood spots.

Key concepts: Dried blood, Spots, Filter paper, Chromatography, Reagent, Chemistry, Whole blood, Analytical Chemistry (journal)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Prediction of haematocrit in dried blood spots from the measurement of haemoglobin using commercially available sodium lauryl sulphate — Research Paper | ScholarLens