1949Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Labor Law: Constitutional Law: Due Process of Law: State Power to Enjoin Peaceful Picketing

L. Lea

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were members and officers of a union which represented many of the truck drivers employed by these peddlers. In carrying out a scheme to unionize all peddlers, defendants attempted to obtain plaintiff's agreement not to sell ice to non-union peddlers. Such an agreement would violate the state anti-trust law. On plaintiff's refusal, defendants peacefully picketed its plant. Plaintiff immediately suffered an 85% loss of business, and the state court granted it an injunction against the picketing. On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, affirmed. A state court may enjoin picketing which has as its principal object the violation of a valid state statute. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. (U.S. 1949) 69 S.Ct. 684.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were members and officers of a union which represented many of the truck drivers employed by these peddlers. In carrying out a scheme to unionize all peddlers, defendants attempted to obtain plaintiff's agreement not to sell ice to non-union peddlers. Such an agreement would violate the state anti-trust law. On plaintiff's refusal, defendants peacefully picketed its plant. Plaintiff immediately suffered an 85% loss of business, and the state court granted it an injunction against the picketing. On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, affirmed. A state court may enjoin picketing which has as its principal object the violation of a valid state statute. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. (U.S. 1949) 69 S.Ct. 684.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Plaintiff was a wholesale ice distributor, selling ice to independent contractors. Defendants were members and officers of a union which represented many of the truck drivers employed by these peddlers. In carrying out a scheme to unionize all peddlers, defendants attempted to obtain plaintiff's agreement not to sell ice to non-union peddlers. Such an agreement would violate the state anti-trust law. On plaintiff's refusal, defendants peacefully picketed its plant. Plaintiff immediately suffered an 85% loss of business, and the state court granted it an injunction against the picketing. On appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States, held, affirmed. A state court may enjoin picketing which has as its principal object the violation of a valid state statute. Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. (U.S. 1949) 69 S.Ct. 684.

Key concepts: Picketing, Law, Labour law, State (computer science), Political science, Due process, Constitutional law, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Labor Law: Constitutional Law: Due Process of Law: State Power to Enjoin Peaceful Picketing — Research Paper | ScholarLens