Perceptions of fluid restriction self-care in heart failure
Leanna Woods, Kim Walker, Jed Duff
Abstract
Leanna Woods, Kim Walker, Jed Duff
Abstract
Objectives: Daily fluid restriction reduces fluid retention and therefore lessens the symptom burden of heart failure but the literature shows that adherence is sub-optimal. The objectives of the current study were to understand patients' experiences of fluid restriction self-care and identify factors affecting adherence. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four inpatients. Data were interpreted using the World Health Organization's dimensions affecting adherence; these dimensions were patient-related, condition-related, therapy-related, health system/team-related and socioeconomic-related. Findings: Fluid restriction self-care was unpleasant and challenging. The most commonly reported factors were in the therapy-related dimension, and included unrelenting, uncomfortable thirst and dry mouth, which were a cause of significant distress. Patients reported unease about the complexity of the condition, misunderstood the treatment rationale and were confused about the benefit of adherence. Conclusions: The current study supports the current consensus that self-care for long-term conditions is complex and challenging. More patient-focused research is advised to address difficulties in adhering to fluid restriction. Improvement in thirst and dry-mouth alleviation strategies is needed.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objectives: Daily fluid restriction reduces fluid retention and therefore lessens the symptom burden of heart failure but the literature shows that adherence is sub-optimal. The objectives of the current study were to understand patients' experiences of fluid restriction self-care and identify factors affecting adherence. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four inpatients. Data were interpreted using the World Health Organization's dimensions affecting adherence; these dimensions were patient-related, condition-related, therapy-related, health system/team-related and socioeconomic-related. Findings: Fluid restriction self-care was unpleasant and challenging. The most commonly reported factors were in the therapy-related dimension, and included unrelenting, uncomfortable thirst and dry mouth, which were a cause of significant distress. Patients reported unease about the complexity of the condition, misunderstood the treatment rationale and were confused about the benefit of adherence. Conclusions: The current study supports the current consensus that self-care for long-term conditions is complex and challenging. More patient-focused research is advised to address difficulties in adhering to fluid restriction. Improvement in thirst and dry-mouth alleviation strategies is needed.
Key concepts: Fluid restriction, Fluid intake, Medicine, Thirst, Socioeconomic status, Heart failure, Distress, Self care