2018British Journal of Cardiac NursingOpen access

Perceptions of fluid restriction self-care in heart failure

Leanna Woods, Kim Walker, Jed Duff

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Daily fluid restriction reduces fluid retention and therefore lessens the symptom burden of heart failure but the literature shows that adherence is sub-optimal. The objectives of the current study were to understand patients' experiences of fluid restriction self-care and identify factors affecting adherence. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four inpatients. Data were interpreted using the World Health Organization's dimensions affecting adherence; these dimensions were patient-related, condition-related, therapy-related, health system/team-related and socioeconomic-related. Findings: Fluid restriction self-care was unpleasant and challenging. The most commonly reported factors were in the therapy-related dimension, and included unrelenting, uncomfortable thirst and dry mouth, which were a cause of significant distress. Patients reported unease about the complexity of the condition, misunderstood the treatment rationale and were confused about the benefit of adherence. Conclusions: The current study supports the current consensus that self-care for long-term conditions is complex and challenging. More patient-focused research is advised to address difficulties in adhering to fluid restriction. Improvement in thirst and dry-mouth alleviation strategies is needed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: Daily fluid restriction reduces fluid retention and therefore lessens the symptom burden of heart failure but the literature shows that adherence is sub-optimal. The objectives of the current study were to understand patients' experiences of fluid restriction self-care and identify factors affecting adherence. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four inpatients. Data were interpreted using the World Health Organization's dimensions affecting adherence; these dimensions were patient-related, condition-related, therapy-related, health system/team-related and socioeconomic-related. Findings: Fluid restriction self-care was unpleasant and challenging. The most commonly reported factors were in the therapy-related dimension, and included unrelenting, uncomfortable thirst and dry mouth, which were a cause of significant distress. Patients reported unease about the complexity of the condition, misunderstood the treatment rationale and were confused about the benefit of adherence. Conclusions: The current study supports the current consensus that self-care for long-term conditions is complex and challenging. More patient-focused research is advised to address difficulties in adhering to fluid restriction. Improvement in thirst and dry-mouth alleviation strategies is needed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: Daily fluid restriction reduces fluid retention and therefore lessens the symptom burden of heart failure but the literature shows that adherence is sub-optimal. The objectives of the current study were to understand patients' experiences of fluid restriction self-care and identify factors affecting adherence. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with four inpatients. Data were interpreted using the World Health Organization's dimensions affecting adherence; these dimensions were patient-related, condition-related, therapy-related, health system/team-related and socioeconomic-related. Findings: Fluid restriction self-care was unpleasant and challenging. The most commonly reported factors were in the therapy-related dimension, and included unrelenting, uncomfortable thirst and dry mouth, which were a cause of significant distress. Patients reported unease about the complexity of the condition, misunderstood the treatment rationale and were confused about the benefit of adherence. Conclusions: The current study supports the current consensus that self-care for long-term conditions is complex and challenging. More patient-focused research is advised to address difficulties in adhering to fluid restriction. Improvement in thirst and dry-mouth alleviation strategies is needed.

Key concepts: Fluid restriction, Fluid intake, Medicine, Thirst, Socioeconomic status, Heart failure, Distress, Self care

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Perceptions of fluid restriction self-care in heart failure — Research Paper | ScholarLens