2018•Journal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthOpen access

Presence and Consequences of Coexisting Methane Gas With Hydrate Under Two Phase Water‐Hydrate Stability Conditions

Sourav Kumar Sahoo, Héctor Marín‐Moreno, Laurence North, Ismael Himar Falcón-Suárez, B. N. Madhusudhan, Angus Ian Best, T. A. Minshull

Open full text 50 citations

Abstract

Abstract Methane hydrate saturation estimates from remote geophysical data and borehole logs are needed to assess the role of hydrates in climate change, continental slope stability, and energy resource potential. Here we present laboratory hydrate formation/dissociation experiments in which we determined the methane hydrate content independently from pore pressure and temperature and from electrical resistivity. Using these laboratory experiments, we demonstrate that hydrate formation does not take up all the methane gas or water even if the system is under two phase water‐hydrate stability conditions and gas is well distributed in the sample. The experiment started with methane gas and water saturations of 16.5% and 83.5%, respectively; during the experiment, hydrate saturation proceeded up to 26% along with 12% gas and 62% water remaining in the system. The coexistence of hydrate and gas is one possible explanation for discrepancies between estimates of hydrate saturation from electrical and acoustic methods. We suggest that an important mechanism for this coexistence is the formation of a hydrate film enveloping methane gas bubbles, trapping the remaining gas inside.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Methane hydrate saturation estimates from remote geophysical data and borehole logs are needed to assess the role of hydrates in climate change, continental slope stability, and energy resource potential. Here we present laboratory hydrate formation/dissociation experiments in which we determined the methane hydrate content independently from pore pressure and temperature and from electrical resistivity. Using these laboratory experiments, we demonstrate that hydrate formation does not take up all the methane gas or water even if the system is under two phase water‐hydrate stability conditions and gas is well distributed in the sample. The experiment started with methane gas and water saturations of 16.5% and 83.5%, respectively; during the experiment, hydrate saturation proceeded up to 26% along with 12% gas and 62% water remaining in the system. The coexistence of hydrate and gas is one possible explanation for discrepancies between estimates of hydrate saturation from electrical and acoustic methods. We suggest that an important mechanism for this coexistence is the formation of a hydrate film enveloping methane gas bubbles, trapping the remaining gas inside.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Methane hydrate saturation estimates from remote geophysical data and borehole logs are needed to assess the role of hydrates in climate change, continental slope stability, and energy resource potential. Here we present laboratory hydrate formation/dissociation experiments in which we determined the methane hydrate content independently from pore pressure and temperature and from electrical resistivity. Using these laboratory experiments, we demonstrate that hydrate formation does not take up all the methane gas or water even if the system is under two phase water‐hydrate stability conditions and gas is well distributed in the sample. The experiment started with methane gas and water saturations of 16.5% and 83.5%, respectively; during the experiment, hydrate saturation proceeded up to 26% along with 12% gas and 62% water remaining in the system. The coexistence of hydrate and gas is one possible explanation for discrepancies between estimates of hydrate saturation from electrical and acoustic methods. We suggest that an important mechanism for this coexistence is the formation of a hydrate film enveloping methane gas bubbles, trapping the remaining gas inside.

Key concepts: Hydrate, Clathrate hydrate, Methane, Saturation (graph theory), Natural gas, Borehole, Chemistry, Mineralogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Presence and Consequences of Coexisting Methane Gas With Hydrate Under Two Phase Water‐Hydrate Stability Conditions — Research Paper | ScholarLens