Questions and Thoughts on Winnicott/Bion Inspired by Lesley Caldwell's ‘A Psychoanalysis of Being’
Peter Goldberg
Abstract
Peter Goldberg
Abstract
This response to Lesley Caldwell's paper on Winnicott and Being explores some of the ramifications of Winnicott's work on current developments in clinical theory. Four questions are posed, touching on the topics of psychosomatic dissociation, the place of the object in Winnicott's thought, the role of non‐communication, and the status of the concept of regression.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This response to Lesley Caldwell's paper on Winnicott and Being explores some of the ramifications of Winnicott's work on current developments in clinical theory. Four questions are posed, touching on the topics of psychosomatic dissociation, the place of the object in Winnicott's thought, the role of non‐communication, and the status of the concept of regression.
Key concepts: Psychology, Psychoanalysis, Object relations theory, Dissociation (chemistry), Object (grammar), Psychotherapist, Psychoanalytic theory, Philosophy