2018viXraRequires access

Problem of Why there is Something Instead of Nothing © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved.

Colin James

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For Why there is something rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies something. (1) For Why there is anything rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies anything. (2) The difference from (1) to (2) is in the modal or quantified operator in the consequent going from possibility to necessity or from one/some to all. Both expressions (1) and (2) are tautologous and theorems. This means nothing implies anything, but anything does not imply nothing. Hence the problem is answered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For Why there is something rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies something. (1) For Why there is anything rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies anything. (2) The difference from (1) to (2) is in the modal or quantified operator in the consequent going from possibility to necessity or from one/some to all. Both expressions (1) and (2) are tautologous and theorems. This means nothing implies anything, but anything does not imply nothing. Hence the problem is answered.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For Why there is something rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies something. (1) For Why there is anything rather than nothing, we rewrite Nothing implies anything. (2) The difference from (1) to (2) is in the modal or quantified operator in the consequent going from possibility to necessity or from one/some to all. Both expressions (1) and (2) are tautologous and theorems. This means nothing implies anything, but anything does not imply nothing. Hence the problem is answered.

Key concepts: Nothing, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Problem of Why there is Something Instead of Nothing © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All Rights Reserved. — Research Paper | ScholarLens