2018ACM Transactions on AlgorithmsRequires access

Known Algorithms on Graphs of Bounded Treewidth Are Probably Optimal

Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Saket Saurabh

Open publisher page 62 citations

Abstract

We obtain a number of lower bounds on the running time of algorithms solving problems on graphs of bounded treewidth. We prove the results under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In particular, assuming that n -variable m -clause SAT cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) n m O (1) , we show that for any ϵ > 0: • I ndependent S et cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • D ominating S et cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • M ax C ut cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • O dd C ycle T ransversal cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • For any fixed q ≥ 3, q -C oloring cannot be solved in time ( q -ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • P artition I nto T riangles cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) . Our lower bounds match the running times for the best known algorithms for the problems, up to the ϵ in the base.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We obtain a number of lower bounds on the running time of algorithms solving problems on graphs of bounded treewidth. We prove the results under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In particular, assuming that n -variable m -clause SAT cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) n m O (1) , we show that for any ϵ > 0: • I ndependent S et cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • D ominating S et cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • M ax C ut cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • O dd C ycle T ransversal cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • For any fixed q ≥ 3, q -C oloring cannot be solved in time ( q -ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • P artition I nto T riangles cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) . Our lower bounds match the running times for the best known algorithms for the problems, up to the ϵ in the base.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 62 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We obtain a number of lower bounds on the running time of algorithms solving problems on graphs of bounded treewidth. We prove the results under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis of Impagliazzo and Paturi. In particular, assuming that n -variable m -clause SAT cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) n m O (1) , we show that for any ϵ > 0: • I ndependent S et cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • D ominating S et cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • M ax C ut cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • O dd C ycle T ransversal cannot be solved in time (3-ϵ) tw( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • For any fixed q ≥ 3, q -C oloring cannot be solved in time ( q -ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) , • P artition I nto T riangles cannot be solved in time (2-ϵ) tw ( G ) | V ( G )| O (1) . Our lower bounds match the running times for the best known algorithms for the problems, up to the ϵ in the base.

Key concepts: Treewidth, Exponential time hypothesis, Combinatorics, Running time, Mathematics, Bounded function, Time complexity, Base (topology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Known Algorithms on Graphs of Bounded Treewidth Are Probably Optimal — Research Paper | ScholarLens