1955Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Antitrust Administration and Enforcement

John T. Chadwell

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The importance of the nation's antitrust policy requires that administration and enforcement powers and techniques be equal to the huge task of effectively safeguarding competition. The recommendations of the Attorney General's Committee represent a statesmanlike effort to balance the need for effective enforcement with the need for the preservation of fairness and the conservation of time and resources in antitrust litigation. Some of the recommendations will undoubtedly engender heated controversy; others seem relatively uncontroversial.\nMany individual topics are dealt with in the Report of the committee and space does not permit comment upon all of them. The following discussion is confined to what would seem to be the most important aspects of the committee's work on administration and enforcement. The section of the Report is divided into four parts, and the comments made here follow the same organization: (1) The Department of Justice; (2) The Federal Trade Commission; (3) Related Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission; and ( 4) Private Antitrust Suits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The importance of the nation's antitrust policy requires that administration and enforcement powers and techniques be equal to the huge task of effectively safeguarding competition. The recommendations of the Attorney General's Committee represent a statesmanlike effort to balance the need for effective enforcement with the need for the preservation of fairness and the conservation of time and resources in antitrust litigation. Some of the recommendations will undoubtedly engender heated controversy; others seem relatively uncontroversial.\nMany individual topics are dealt with in the Report of the committee and space does not permit comment upon all of them. The following discussion is confined to what would seem to be the most important aspects of the committee's work on administration and enforcement. The section of the Report is divided into four parts, and the comments made here follow the same organization: (1) The Department of Justice; (2) The Federal Trade Commission; (3) Related Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission; and ( 4) Private Antitrust Suits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The importance of the nation's antitrust policy requires that administration and enforcement powers and techniques be equal to the huge task of effectively safeguarding competition. The recommendations of the Attorney General's Committee represent a statesmanlike effort to balance the need for effective enforcement with the need for the preservation of fairness and the conservation of time and resources in antitrust litigation. Some of the recommendations will undoubtedly engender heated controversy; others seem relatively uncontroversial.\nMany individual topics are dealt with in the Report of the committee and space does not permit comment upon all of them. The following discussion is confined to what would seem to be the most important aspects of the committee's work on administration and enforcement. The section of the Report is divided into four parts, and the comments made here follow the same organization: (1) The Department of Justice; (2) The Federal Trade Commission; (3) Related Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission; and ( 4) Private Antitrust Suits.

Key concepts: Administration (probate law), Law and economics, Business, Enforcement, Law, Economics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Antitrust Administration and Enforcement — Research Paper | ScholarLens