2017CentAUR (University of Reading)Requires access

Uruk and Ur in the city seal impressions, 3100-2750 BC: new evidence, new approaches

Roger Matthews, Amy Richardson

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Uruk and Ur were two of the most important centres in the early development of the world’s first urban settlement in Lower Mesopotamia in the later fourth and early third millennia BC. And yet our knowledge of their socio-political structures and inter-city interactions during these earliest centuries of urban development is highly restricted. For Uruk, the earliest levels underlying the extensive Uruk IV and III precincts are known only from limited soundings and without extensive architectural contextualisation, while the Uruk IV-III buildings themselves were rebuilt and eventually severely truncated in a programme of planned rebuilding at ca. 3100 BC. For Ur, while recent studies have significantly augmented our understanding of the city’s early development, we are nevertheless limited to glimpses of Ur’s early urban phases through small soundings at the base of Woolley’s major trenches within the sacred precincts. Any new information and insights into the socio-political landscapes within which Uruk and Ur operated at the turn of the fourth-third millennia BC are therefore greatly to be welcomed, especially as it is likely to be a long time before modern scientific excavations at either of these key sites investigates levels of this period.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Uruk and Ur were two of the most important centres in the early development of the world’s first urban settlement in Lower Mesopotamia in the later fourth and early third millennia BC. And yet our knowledge of their socio-political structures and inter-city interactions during these earliest centuries of urban development is highly restricted. For Uruk, the earliest levels underlying the extensive Uruk IV and III precincts are known only from limited soundings and without extensive architectural contextualisation, while the Uruk IV-III buildings themselves were rebuilt and eventually severely truncated in a programme of planned rebuilding at ca. 3100 BC. For Ur, while recent studies have significantly augmented our understanding of the city’s early development, we are nevertheless limited to glimpses of Ur’s early urban phases through small soundings at the base of Woolley’s major trenches within the sacred precincts. Any new information and insights into the socio-political landscapes within which Uruk and Ur operated at the turn of the fourth-third millennia BC are therefore greatly to be welcomed, especially as it is likely to be a long time before modern scientific excavations at either of these key sites investigates levels of this period.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Uruk and Ur were two of the most important centres in the early development of the world’s first urban settlement in Lower Mesopotamia in the later fourth and early third millennia BC. And yet our knowledge of their socio-political structures and inter-city interactions during these earliest centuries of urban development is highly restricted. For Uruk, the earliest levels underlying the extensive Uruk IV and III precincts are known only from limited soundings and without extensive architectural contextualisation, while the Uruk IV-III buildings themselves were rebuilt and eventually severely truncated in a programme of planned rebuilding at ca. 3100 BC. For Ur, while recent studies have significantly augmented our understanding of the city’s early development, we are nevertheless limited to glimpses of Ur’s early urban phases through small soundings at the base of Woolley’s major trenches within the sacred precincts. Any new information and insights into the socio-political landscapes within which Uruk and Ur operated at the turn of the fourth-third millennia BC are therefore greatly to be welcomed, especially as it is likely to be a long time before modern scientific excavations at either of these key sites investigates levels of this period.

Key concepts: Mesopotamia, Politics, Excavation, Beaker, Archaeology, History, Ancient history, Period (music)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Uruk and Ur in the city seal impressions, 3100-2750 BC: new evidence, new approaches — Research Paper | ScholarLens