2018Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryRequires access

Forearm-Based Turnover Muscle Flaps for Elbow Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Comparison of Regional Coverage Based on Distal Flap Perfusion

Yash J. Avashia, Ronnie L. Shammas, Luke Poveromo, Travis J. Dekker, Jacob Brubacher, Marc J. Richard, David S. Ruch, Suhail K. Mithani

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elbow wounds pose a reconstructive challenge. Prior studies have described the vascular anatomy of both the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flaps. The goal of this study was to describe the distal flap perfusion of the flexor carpi radialis, with a direct comparison of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and flexor carpi radialis muscle flaps for coverage around the elbow. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen upper extremity specimens were dissected for brachioradialis, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps. Vascular data from prior studies were combined with our anatomical measurements to determine the area of perfused coverage around the elbow for the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris. The flexor carpi radialis flap distal vascular perfusion was examined separately with transverse sections at 1-cm intervals after India ink injections to determine distal flap perfusion and elbow coverage. Perfusion data were plotted on x and y axes over the posterior elbow. RESULTS: The brachioradialis muscle covered an average of 56 percent of the x axis and 7.4 percent of the y axis. The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle covered an average of 90 percent of the elbow along the x axis and 23.3 percent of elbow along the y axis. The flexor carpi radialis covered an average of 34 percent of the x axis and 4.8 percent of the y axis. CONCLUSION: The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle provides the most versatile and robust coverage over the posterior elbow, followed by the brachioradialis muscle, which consistently provides coverage over the lateral epicondyle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Elbow wounds pose a reconstructive challenge. Prior studies have described the vascular anatomy of both the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flaps. The goal of this study was to describe the distal flap perfusion of the flexor carpi radialis, with a direct comparison of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and flexor carpi radialis muscle flaps for coverage around the elbow. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen upper extremity specimens were dissected for brachioradialis, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps. Vascular data from prior studies were combined with our anatomical measurements to determine the area of perfused coverage around the elbow for the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris. The flexor carpi radialis flap distal vascular perfusion was examined separately with transverse sections at 1-cm intervals after India ink injections to determine distal flap perfusion and elbow coverage. Perfusion data were plotted on x and y axes over the posterior elbow. RESULTS: The brachioradialis muscle covered an average of 56 percent of the x axis and 7.4 percent of the y axis. The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle covered an average of 90 percent of the elbow along the x axis and 23.3 percent of elbow along the y axis. The flexor carpi radialis covered an average of 34 percent of the x axis and 4.8 percent of the y axis. CONCLUSION: The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle provides the most versatile and robust coverage over the posterior elbow, followed by the brachioradialis muscle, which consistently provides coverage over the lateral epicondyle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Elbow wounds pose a reconstructive challenge. Prior studies have described the vascular anatomy of both the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscle flaps. The goal of this study was to describe the distal flap perfusion of the flexor carpi radialis, with a direct comparison of the brachioradialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, and flexor carpi radialis muscle flaps for coverage around the elbow. METHODS: Six fresh-frozen upper extremity specimens were dissected for brachioradialis, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor carpi ulnaris flaps. Vascular data from prior studies were combined with our anatomical measurements to determine the area of perfused coverage around the elbow for the brachioradialis and flexor carpi ulnaris. The flexor carpi radialis flap distal vascular perfusion was examined separately with transverse sections at 1-cm intervals after India ink injections to determine distal flap perfusion and elbow coverage. Perfusion data were plotted on x and y axes over the posterior elbow. RESULTS: The brachioradialis muscle covered an average of 56 percent of the x axis and 7.4 percent of the y axis. The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle covered an average of 90 percent of the elbow along the x axis and 23.3 percent of elbow along the y axis. The flexor carpi radialis covered an average of 34 percent of the x axis and 4.8 percent of the y axis. CONCLUSION: The flexor carpi ulnaris muscle provides the most versatile and robust coverage over the posterior elbow, followed by the brachioradialis muscle, which consistently provides coverage over the lateral epicondyle.

Key concepts: Brachioradialis, Flexor Carpi Ulnaris, Extensor Carpi Ulnaris, Anatomy, Medicine, Elbow, Forearm, Ulnar nerve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forearm-Based Turnover Muscle Flaps for Elbow Soft-Tissue Reconstruction: A Comparison of Regional Coverage Based on Distal Flap Perfusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens