2018Journal of Commerce and Accounting ResearchRequires access

Audit Committee Effectiveness:Relationship between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees and Non-Audit Service Fees

Anjana Rani

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Audit committee responsibilities have increased significantly in recent years due to uncertainties arising from a changing statutory, regulatory, legal and risk environment for companies. Over the past two decades their role has evolved into an independent oversight responsibility for the audit processes and the financial reporting process. The results highlight that the audit committee size and the presence of independent directors on the audit committee board have a higher demand for oversight and thus a higher requirement for audit effort resulting in higher audit fees. The results indicate that higher audit fees entail increased audit testing and higher audit quality. Audit committee expertise is related to lower audit fees indicating that high-quality audit committees are in a position to effectively oversee the financial reporting process themselves and require less audit efforts from the external auditor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Audit committee responsibilities have increased significantly in recent years due to uncertainties arising from a changing statutory, regulatory, legal and risk environment for companies. Over the past two decades their role has evolved into an independent oversight responsibility for the audit processes and the financial reporting process. The results highlight that the audit committee size and the presence of independent directors on the audit committee board have a higher demand for oversight and thus a higher requirement for audit effort resulting in higher audit fees. The results indicate that higher audit fees entail increased audit testing and higher audit quality. Audit committee expertise is related to lower audit fees indicating that high-quality audit committees are in a position to effectively oversee the financial reporting process themselves and require less audit efforts from the external auditor.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Audit committee responsibilities have increased significantly in recent years due to uncertainties arising from a changing statutory, regulatory, legal and risk environment for companies. Over the past two decades their role has evolved into an independent oversight responsibility for the audit processes and the financial reporting process. The results highlight that the audit committee size and the presence of independent directors on the audit committee board have a higher demand for oversight and thus a higher requirement for audit effort resulting in higher audit fees. The results indicate that higher audit fees entail increased audit testing and higher audit quality. Audit committee expertise is related to lower audit fees indicating that high-quality audit committees are in a position to effectively oversee the financial reporting process themselves and require less audit efforts from the external auditor.

Key concepts: Chief audit executive, Joint audit, Audit evidence, Audit committee, Accounting, Audit plan, Audit, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Audit Committee Effectiveness:Relationship between Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees and Non-Audit Service Fees — Research Paper | ScholarLens