2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Is Folk Psychology a Theory?

Ian Ravenscroft

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores some ways in which folk psychology has been taken to be a theory. It discusses eliminativism – the doctrine that the mental states over which folk psychology quantifies simply don’t exist. The chapter describes theorists who deny that folk psychology is a theory. It aims to sketche the claim that folk psychology is best understood in terms of mental simulation. In its purest form, simulation theory denies that folk psychology involves a theory of human psychology. Simulation theory begins with the model of human action offered by intentional psychology. The term “folk psychology” is deliberately used to mark a contrast with what psychologists might call “scientific psychology.” The mindreading approach to folk psychology is akin to the first strategy, simulation theory akin to the second. Realists about mental states claim that beliefs and desires are bona fide states of the human organism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores some ways in which folk psychology has been taken to be a theory. It discusses eliminativism – the doctrine that the mental states over which folk psychology quantifies simply don’t exist. The chapter describes theorists who deny that folk psychology is a theory. It aims to sketche the claim that folk psychology is best understood in terms of mental simulation. In its purest form, simulation theory denies that folk psychology involves a theory of human psychology. Simulation theory begins with the model of human action offered by intentional psychology. The term “folk psychology” is deliberately used to mark a contrast with what psychologists might call “scientific psychology.” The mindreading approach to folk psychology is akin to the first strategy, simulation theory akin to the second. Realists about mental states claim that beliefs and desires are bona fide states of the human organism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores some ways in which folk psychology has been taken to be a theory. It discusses eliminativism – the doctrine that the mental states over which folk psychology quantifies simply don’t exist. The chapter describes theorists who deny that folk psychology is a theory. It aims to sketche the claim that folk psychology is best understood in terms of mental simulation. In its purest form, simulation theory denies that folk psychology involves a theory of human psychology. Simulation theory begins with the model of human action offered by intentional psychology. The term “folk psychology” is deliberately used to mark a contrast with what psychologists might call “scientific psychology.” The mindreading approach to folk psychology is akin to the first strategy, simulation theory akin to the second. Realists about mental states claim that beliefs and desires are bona fide states of the human organism.

Key concepts: Folk psychology, Psychology, Epistemology, Psychoanalysis, Cognitive science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Folk Psychology a Theory? — Research Paper | ScholarLens