1937•Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Negligence: Guest Statutes: Proximate Cause

Erwin S. Simon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The deceased was fatally injured while riding as a guest in defendant's truck. In the course of the action for damages brought by the administratrix, the court instructed that "if you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the driver of the truck was guilty of willful and wanton misconduct . . . and that as a consequence thereof the accident occurred, and further, that such conduct contributed to the death of plaintiff's intestate," then the jury should find for the plaintiff. Verdict was for the plaintiff and defendant appealed. Held, that the instruction was erroneous because it allowed the jury to find for the plaintiff upon proof that the acts of the driver merely contributed to the death and did not require a finding of proximate cause. Denton v. Midwest Dairy Products Corp., 284 Ill. App. 279, 1 N. E. (2d) 807 (1936).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The deceased was fatally injured while riding as a guest in defendant's truck. In the course of the action for damages brought by the administratrix, the court instructed that "if you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the driver of the truck was guilty of willful and wanton misconduct . . . and that as a consequence thereof the accident occurred, and further, that such conduct contributed to the death of plaintiff's intestate," then the jury should find for the plaintiff. Verdict was for the plaintiff and defendant appealed. Held, that the instruction was erroneous because it allowed the jury to find for the plaintiff upon proof that the acts of the driver merely contributed to the death and did not require a finding of proximate cause. Denton v. Midwest Dairy Products Corp., 284 Ill. App. 279, 1 N. E. (2d) 807 (1936).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The deceased was fatally injured while riding as a guest in defendant's truck. In the course of the action for damages brought by the administratrix, the court instructed that "if you find from a preponderance of the evidence that the driver of the truck was guilty of willful and wanton misconduct . . . and that as a consequence thereof the accident occurred, and further, that such conduct contributed to the death of plaintiff's intestate," then the jury should find for the plaintiff. Verdict was for the plaintiff and defendant appealed. Held, that the instruction was erroneous because it allowed the jury to find for the plaintiff upon proof that the acts of the driver merely contributed to the death and did not require a finding of proximate cause. Denton v. Midwest Dairy Products Corp., 284 Ill. App. 279, 1 N. E. (2d) 807 (1936).

Key concepts: Proximate and ultimate causation, Statute, Law, Statute of limitations, Contributory negligence, Business, Political science, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Negligence: Guest Statutes: Proximate Cause — Research Paper | ScholarLens