1991•Michigan Law ReviewRequires access

Voting Rights Act Section 2: Racially Polarized Voting and the Minority Community's Representative of Choice

Evelyn E. Shockley

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A much needed congressional effort to give substance to African-American suffrage resulted in the enactment of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (the Act). Although the fifteenth amendment gave African-American men the right to vote in 1870, almost a hundred years later they were still largely unable to exercise the right. This condition did not result from apathy on the part of African-American voters, but rather from their inability to overcome barriers set up by white racists. Practices whites instituted, such as "[l]iteracy and 'understanding' tests, poll taxes, the white primary, intimidation, [and] violence," prevented African-Americans from realizing their constitutional right to vote.\nPart I analyzes the case law, beginning with the first Supreme Court interpretation of section 2 and then examining the three general ways the lower courts have responded. Part II explores the legislative history of the amendment to section 2 in order to uncover congressional intent. Part III then proposes a solution based on congressional intent and a theory of civic inclusion for minorities. Finally, Part III concludes by testing the proposed solution against the concerns which originally created the debate and shows that the solution meets the concerns voiced on both sides of the issue.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A much needed congressional effort to give substance to African-American suffrage resulted in the enactment of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (the Act). Although the fifteenth amendment gave African-American men the right to vote in 1870, almost a hundred years later they were still largely unable to exercise the right. This condition did not result from apathy on the part of African-American voters, but rather from their inability to overcome barriers set up by white racists. Practices whites instituted, such as "[l]iteracy and 'understanding' tests, poll taxes, the white primary, intimidation, [and] violence," prevented African-Americans from realizing their constitutional right to vote.\nPart I analyzes the case law, beginning with the first Supreme Court interpretation of section 2 and then examining the three general ways the lower courts have responded. Part II explores the legislative history of the amendment to section 2 in order to uncover congressional intent. Part III then proposes a solution based on congressional intent and a theory of civic inclusion for minorities. Finally, Part III concludes by testing the proposed solution against the concerns which originally created the debate and shows that the solution meets the concerns voiced on both sides of the issue.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A much needed congressional effort to give substance to African-American suffrage resulted in the enactment of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (the Act). Although the fifteenth amendment gave African-American men the right to vote in 1870, almost a hundred years later they were still largely unable to exercise the right. This condition did not result from apathy on the part of African-American voters, but rather from their inability to overcome barriers set up by white racists. Practices whites instituted, such as "[l]iteracy and 'understanding' tests, poll taxes, the white primary, intimidation, [and] violence," prevented African-Americans from realizing their constitutional right to vote.\nPart I analyzes the case law, beginning with the first Supreme Court interpretation of section 2 and then examining the three general ways the lower courts have responded. Part II explores the legislative history of the amendment to section 2 in order to uncover congressional intent. Part III then proposes a solution based on congressional intent and a theory of civic inclusion for minorities. Finally, Part III concludes by testing the proposed solution against the concerns which originally created the debate and shows that the solution meets the concerns voiced on both sides of the issue.

Key concepts: Voting, Section (typography), Political science, Disapproval voting, Law, Straight-ticket voting, Instant-runoff voting, Group voting ticket

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Voting Rights Act Section 2: Racially Polarized Voting and the Minority Community's Representative of Choice — Research Paper | ScholarLens