1940•Michigan Law ReviewOpen access

Negligence: Assumption of Risk: Contributory Negligence

Roy L. Steinheimer

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Plaintiff, knowing that the driver of the automobile in which she was riding had been drinking, continued to ride with him though she was under no compulsion to do so. In an accident resulting from the driver's intoxication, plaintiff was injured and the driver killed. In an action against the personal representative of the driver, the defendant raised the defense of volenti non fit injuria. Held, for plaintiff. The maxim volenti non fit injuria would apply only where the drunkenness of the driver was extreme and glaring. Dann v. Hamilton, [1939] 1 K. B. 509.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Plaintiff, knowing that the driver of the automobile in which she was riding had been drinking, continued to ride with him though she was under no compulsion to do so. In an accident resulting from the driver's intoxication, plaintiff was injured and the driver killed. In an action against the personal representative of the driver, the defendant raised the defense of volenti non fit injuria. Held, for plaintiff. The maxim volenti non fit injuria would apply only where the drunkenness of the driver was extreme and glaring. Dann v. Hamilton, [1939] 1 K. B. 509.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Plaintiff, knowing that the driver of the automobile in which she was riding had been drinking, continued to ride with him though she was under no compulsion to do so. In an accident resulting from the driver's intoxication, plaintiff was injured and the driver killed. In an action against the personal representative of the driver, the defendant raised the defense of volenti non fit injuria. Held, for plaintiff. The maxim volenti non fit injuria would apply only where the drunkenness of the driver was extreme and glaring. Dann v. Hamilton, [1939] 1 K. B. 509.

Key concepts: Contributory negligence, Res ipsa loquitur, Law, Tort, Business, Actuarial science, Economics, Liability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Negligence: Assumption of Risk: Contributory Negligence — Research Paper | ScholarLens