2018Mesentery and PeritoneumOpen access

AB170. 193. An anatomical study of sliding pectoralis major advancement flap for sternal defects

Nicholas O’Keeffe, Elizabeth Concannon, Alanna Stanley, Peter Dockery, Niall McInerney, Jack Kelly

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) represent an uncommon but significant complication of open cardiac surgery associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The use of muscle flaps such as pectoralis major advancement flap for DSWI reconstruction has resulted in reduced hospital stay and mortality. One limitation of this flap is the concern for coverage of the lower one third of the sternum, a common area of dehiscence following flap repair. Methods: This study aimed to determine the distance (cm) and surface area (cm2) of sternum covered when pectoralis major is dissected off sequentially from the sternocostal origin and humeral insertion using 20 cadaveric specimens. Results: The largest proportion of sternum was covered when both the origin and insertion were divided, allowing the flap to be islanded on its vascular pedicle. The average distance covered with sternal division alone was 1.22 (min 0–max 3.2) cm and 55.43 cm2 compared with 3.91 (min 0.9–max 6.3) cm and 85.36 cm2 with division at both the humerus and sternum. Conclusions: Division of both the sternal origin and humeral insertion for pectoralis major advancements flaps represents an effective means of increasing sternal cover. This study describes average distance and area covered by the sliding pectoralis major advancement flap. These measurements could inform plastic surgeons in prediction of reconstructive success based on sternal defect size in clinical practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) represent an uncommon but significant complication of open cardiac surgery associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The use of muscle flaps such as pectoralis major advancement flap for DSWI reconstruction has resulted in reduced hospital stay and mortality. One limitation of this flap is the concern for coverage of the lower one third of the sternum, a common area of dehiscence following flap repair. Methods: This study aimed to determine the distance (cm) and surface area (cm2) of sternum covered when pectoralis major is dissected off sequentially from the sternocostal origin and humeral insertion using 20 cadaveric specimens. Results: The largest proportion of sternum was covered when both the origin and insertion were divided, allowing the flap to be islanded on its vascular pedicle. The average distance covered with sternal division alone was 1.22 (min 0–max 3.2) cm and 55.43 cm2 compared with 3.91 (min 0.9–max 6.3) cm and 85.36 cm2 with division at both the humerus and sternum. Conclusions: Division of both the sternal origin and humeral insertion for pectoralis major advancements flaps represents an effective means of increasing sternal cover. This study describes average distance and area covered by the sliding pectoralis major advancement flap. These measurements could inform plastic surgeons in prediction of reconstructive success based on sternal defect size in clinical practice.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Deep sternal wound infections (DSWI) represent an uncommon but significant complication of open cardiac surgery associated with significant mortality and morbidity. The use of muscle flaps such as pectoralis major advancement flap for DSWI reconstruction has resulted in reduced hospital stay and mortality. One limitation of this flap is the concern for coverage of the lower one third of the sternum, a common area of dehiscence following flap repair. Methods: This study aimed to determine the distance (cm) and surface area (cm2) of sternum covered when pectoralis major is dissected off sequentially from the sternocostal origin and humeral insertion using 20 cadaveric specimens. Results: The largest proportion of sternum was covered when both the origin and insertion were divided, allowing the flap to be islanded on its vascular pedicle. The average distance covered with sternal division alone was 1.22 (min 0–max 3.2) cm and 55.43 cm2 compared with 3.91 (min 0.9–max 6.3) cm and 85.36 cm2 with division at both the humerus and sternum. Conclusions: Division of both the sternal origin and humeral insertion for pectoralis major advancements flaps represents an effective means of increasing sternal cover. This study describes average distance and area covered by the sliding pectoralis major advancement flap. These measurements could inform plastic surgeons in prediction of reconstructive success based on sternal defect size in clinical practice.

Key concepts: Sternum, Medicine, Pectoralis major muscle, Pectoralis Muscle, Cadaveric spasm, Surgery, Dehiscence, Wound dehiscence

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AB170. 193. An anatomical study of sliding pectoralis major advancement flap for sternal defects — Research Paper | ScholarLens