2018PubMedRequires access

Comparison Of Biliary Stenting And Surgical Bypass In Palliative Management Of Irresectable Periampullary Carcinoma.

Syed Fahad Shah, Sania Hameed, Jehanzeb Khan Aurakzai, Ali Raza, Muhammad Amjad Chaudhry, Syed Hussain Shah, Syed Zubair Shah

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some 20-40% of the periampullary carcinoma is irresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary stenting and surgical bypass are commonly used palliative procedure. There is no consensus favouring one procedure over the other. This study compares the both procedures. METHODS: This Randomized Controlled Trial included 47 patients who presented with diagnosis of obstructive jaundice due to periampullary carcinoma to the Department of Surgery, Federal General Hospital, Islamabad from July 2012 to December 2014. RESULTS: Out of total 47 patients 27 (57.44%) were males and 20 (42.55%) were females. Group-A included 25 (53.19%) patients while group-B included 22 (46.81%) patients. The mean age in both groups was 62.34 years (SD=±5.01). All patients died during the study. The mean survival time for the stent patients was 7.5 months while the mean survival time for surgical bypass patients was 8.3 months. The jaundice was relived in all surgical (22, 100%) of the patients as compared to (18, 72%) of the patients in stent group. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that surgical bypass as a primary procedure in selected patients provided better jaundice relieve as compared to biliary stenting..

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Some 20-40% of the periampullary carcinoma is irresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary stenting and surgical bypass are commonly used palliative procedure. There is no consensus favouring one procedure over the other. This study compares the both procedures. METHODS: This Randomized Controlled Trial included 47 patients who presented with diagnosis of obstructive jaundice due to periampullary carcinoma to the Department of Surgery, Federal General Hospital, Islamabad from July 2012 to December 2014. RESULTS: Out of total 47 patients 27 (57.44%) were males and 20 (42.55%) were females. Group-A included 25 (53.19%) patients while group-B included 22 (46.81%) patients. The mean age in both groups was 62.34 years (SD=±5.01). All patients died during the study. The mean survival time for the stent patients was 7.5 months while the mean survival time for surgical bypass patients was 8.3 months. The jaundice was relived in all surgical (22, 100%) of the patients as compared to (18, 72%) of the patients in stent group. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that surgical bypass as a primary procedure in selected patients provided better jaundice relieve as compared to biliary stenting..

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Some 20-40% of the periampullary carcinoma is irresectable at the time of diagnosis. Biliary stenting and surgical bypass are commonly used palliative procedure. There is no consensus favouring one procedure over the other. This study compares the both procedures. METHODS: This Randomized Controlled Trial included 47 patients who presented with diagnosis of obstructive jaundice due to periampullary carcinoma to the Department of Surgery, Federal General Hospital, Islamabad from July 2012 to December 2014. RESULTS: Out of total 47 patients 27 (57.44%) were males and 20 (42.55%) were females. Group-A included 25 (53.19%) patients while group-B included 22 (46.81%) patients. The mean age in both groups was 62.34 years (SD=±5.01). All patients died during the study. The mean survival time for the stent patients was 7.5 months while the mean survival time for surgical bypass patients was 8.3 months. The jaundice was relived in all surgical (22, 100%) of the patients as compared to (18, 72%) of the patients in stent group. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that surgical bypass as a primary procedure in selected patients provided better jaundice relieve as compared to biliary stenting..

Key concepts: Medicine, Jaundice, Obstructive jaundice, Surgery, Biliary stent, Stent, General surgery, Periampullary cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison Of Biliary Stenting And Surgical Bypass In Palliative Management Of Irresectable Periampullary Carcinoma. — Research Paper | ScholarLens