2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Sustainability with prospective refrigerants

Alberto Cavallini, Claudio Zilio, J. Steven Brown

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY This paper first presents a brief historical summary of the recent past and current status of refrigerants, and then proceeds to suggest a simple Second Law-based approach using the ideal vapor compression refrigeration cycle to estimate a refrigerant's performance potential. The resulting performance rankings are then supplemented by additional rankings of the exergy losses in the compressor and in the condenser. These methodologies are then applied to several refrigerants: three natural refrigerants (ammonia, propane, and isobutane), five conventional single-component halocarbon refrigerants, two conventional blends of halocarbon refrigerants, and three newer refrigerants (fluorinated propene isomers). Generally speaking, the lower pressure refrigerants have better COP and lesser volumetric cooling capacity than the higher pressure refrigerants; whereas, the lower pressure refrigerants have higher penalty factor (measure of condenser exergy losses) than the higher pressure refrigerants. The analyses presented in this paper suggest that to minimize a refrigeration system's overall impact on the environment, the choice of refrigerant should not necessarily be based on a single criterion but rather should be chosen based on the particular application. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SUMMARY This paper first presents a brief historical summary of the recent past and current status of refrigerants, and then proceeds to suggest a simple Second Law-based approach using the ideal vapor compression refrigeration cycle to estimate a refrigerant's performance potential. The resulting performance rankings are then supplemented by additional rankings of the exergy losses in the compressor and in the condenser. These methodologies are then applied to several refrigerants: three natural refrigerants (ammonia, propane, and isobutane), five conventional single-component halocarbon refrigerants, two conventional blends of halocarbon refrigerants, and three newer refrigerants (fluorinated propene isomers). Generally speaking, the lower pressure refrigerants have better COP and lesser volumetric cooling capacity than the higher pressure refrigerants; whereas, the lower pressure refrigerants have higher penalty factor (measure of condenser exergy losses) than the higher pressure refrigerants. The analyses presented in this paper suggest that to minimize a refrigeration system's overall impact on the environment, the choice of refrigerant should not necessarily be based on a single criterion but rather should be chosen based on the particular application. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SUMMARY This paper first presents a brief historical summary of the recent past and current status of refrigerants, and then proceeds to suggest a simple Second Law-based approach using the ideal vapor compression refrigeration cycle to estimate a refrigerant's performance potential. The resulting performance rankings are then supplemented by additional rankings of the exergy losses in the compressor and in the condenser. These methodologies are then applied to several refrigerants: three natural refrigerants (ammonia, propane, and isobutane), five conventional single-component halocarbon refrigerants, two conventional blends of halocarbon refrigerants, and three newer refrigerants (fluorinated propene isomers). Generally speaking, the lower pressure refrigerants have better COP and lesser volumetric cooling capacity than the higher pressure refrigerants; whereas, the lower pressure refrigerants have higher penalty factor (measure of condenser exergy losses) than the higher pressure refrigerants. The analyses presented in this paper suggest that to minimize a refrigeration system's overall impact on the environment, the choice of refrigerant should not necessarily be based on a single criterion but rather should be chosen based on the particular application. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Refrigerant, Exergy, Isobutane, Refrigeration, Condenser (optics), Gas compressor, Thermodynamics, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sustainability with prospective refrigerants — Research Paper | ScholarLens