2016DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Coasting Versus GnRH Antagonist Salvage for the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

Cavidan Gülerman, Nafiye Karakaş Yılmaz, Ayla Sargın Oruç, Nazlı Topfedaisi Özkan, Ayten Türkkanı, Esma Sarıkaya, Okan Yenicesu

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to compare the use of GnRH antagonist salvage versus coasting for the prevention of OHSS in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with long GnRH agonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 91 patients (41 in coasting and 49 in GnRH antagonist group) identified as at high risk of developing OHSS were reviewed retrospectively. Groups were compared for occurrence of moderate and severe OHSS, serum estradiol on the day of HCG and IVF outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in terms of moderate and severe OHSS and clinical pregnancy rates. Serum estradiol levels were decreased significantly in GnRH antagonist group. Quality of the transferred embryos was better in the coasting group. CONCLUSION: Our results represent that both coasting and GnRH antagonist salvage are effective strategies to prevent OHSS in women undergoing long GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to compare the use of GnRH antagonist salvage versus coasting for the prevention of OHSS in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with long GnRH agonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 91 patients (41 in coasting and 49 in GnRH antagonist group) identified as at high risk of developing OHSS were reviewed retrospectively. Groups were compared for occurrence of moderate and severe OHSS, serum estradiol on the day of HCG and IVF outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in terms of moderate and severe OHSS and clinical pregnancy rates. Serum estradiol levels were decreased significantly in GnRH antagonist group. Quality of the transferred embryos was better in the coasting group. CONCLUSION: Our results represent that both coasting and GnRH antagonist salvage are effective strategies to prevent OHSS in women undergoing long GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study is to compare the use of GnRH antagonist salvage versus coasting for the prevention of OHSS in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with long GnRH agonist protocol. STUDY DESIGN: Medical records of 91 patients (41 in coasting and 49 in GnRH antagonist group) identified as at high risk of developing OHSS were reviewed retrospectively. Groups were compared for occurrence of moderate and severe OHSS, serum estradiol on the day of HCG and IVF outcomes. RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in terms of moderate and severe OHSS and clinical pregnancy rates. Serum estradiol levels were decreased significantly in GnRH antagonist group. Quality of the transferred embryos was better in the coasting group. CONCLUSION: Our results represent that both coasting and GnRH antagonist salvage are effective strategies to prevent OHSS in women undergoing long GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles.

Key concepts: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, Antagonist, Medicine, Agonist, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, Gynecology, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone, Pregnancy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Coasting Versus GnRH Antagonist Salvage for the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens