2018HaemophiliaOpen access

Desmopressin stimulation testing: Response to intravenous and intranasal forms

Meghan McCormick, Nalyn Siripong, James Cooper

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin is commonly used to reduce bleeding in patients with mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and is available in both intravenous and intranasal forms. Given the variability in response to desmopressin at an individual level, its effectiveness should be assessed with a test dose prior to being advised for use. At this time, no trial has extensively compared the use of intranasal desmopressin to intravenous desmopressin. AIMS: To determine whether both forms of desmopressin are equally effective in yielding a positive response in laboratory assays in paediatric patients with von Willebrand disease or probable von Willebrand disease. METHODS: We evaluated medical record data for 58 patients who underwent desmopressin stimulation testing in our haematology clinic during a 1-year period. Data were collected on demographic information and haematologic laboratory assays prior to desmopressin administration and one hour following desmopressin. RESULTS: There was an absolute increase in von Willebrand antigen to levels appropriate for haemostasis following both forms of desmopressin, although this increase was significantly greater in the intravenous group compared to the intranasal group. There was also a significant absolute increase in Ristocetin Cofactor and Factor VIII levels following desmopressin in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and intranasal forms of desmopressin produce a positive response during desmopressin stimulation testing and can be used to identify patients for whom this medication would be effective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin is commonly used to reduce bleeding in patients with mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and is available in both intravenous and intranasal forms. Given the variability in response to desmopressin at an individual level, its effectiveness should be assessed with a test dose prior to being advised for use. At this time, no trial has extensively compared the use of intranasal desmopressin to intravenous desmopressin. AIMS: To determine whether both forms of desmopressin are equally effective in yielding a positive response in laboratory assays in paediatric patients with von Willebrand disease or probable von Willebrand disease. METHODS: We evaluated medical record data for 58 patients who underwent desmopressin stimulation testing in our haematology clinic during a 1-year period. Data were collected on demographic information and haematologic laboratory assays prior to desmopressin administration and one hour following desmopressin. RESULTS: There was an absolute increase in von Willebrand antigen to levels appropriate for haemostasis following both forms of desmopressin, although this increase was significantly greater in the intravenous group compared to the intranasal group. There was also a significant absolute increase in Ristocetin Cofactor and Factor VIII levels following desmopressin in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and intranasal forms of desmopressin produce a positive response during desmopressin stimulation testing and can be used to identify patients for whom this medication would be effective.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Desmopressin is commonly used to reduce bleeding in patients with mucocutaneous bleeding disorders and is available in both intravenous and intranasal forms. Given the variability in response to desmopressin at an individual level, its effectiveness should be assessed with a test dose prior to being advised for use. At this time, no trial has extensively compared the use of intranasal desmopressin to intravenous desmopressin. AIMS: To determine whether both forms of desmopressin are equally effective in yielding a positive response in laboratory assays in paediatric patients with von Willebrand disease or probable von Willebrand disease. METHODS: We evaluated medical record data for 58 patients who underwent desmopressin stimulation testing in our haematology clinic during a 1-year period. Data were collected on demographic information and haematologic laboratory assays prior to desmopressin administration and one hour following desmopressin. RESULTS: There was an absolute increase in von Willebrand antigen to levels appropriate for haemostasis following both forms of desmopressin, although this increase was significantly greater in the intravenous group compared to the intranasal group. There was also a significant absolute increase in Ristocetin Cofactor and Factor VIII levels following desmopressin in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and intranasal forms of desmopressin produce a positive response during desmopressin stimulation testing and can be used to identify patients for whom this medication would be effective.

Key concepts: Desmopressin, Medicine, Nasal administration, Anesthesia, Internal medicine, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Desmopressin stimulation testing: Response to intravenous and intranasal forms — Research Paper | ScholarLens