2014•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The US Supreme Court grants petitions for writs of certiorari in a case dealing with the question whether a state regulatory board created by state law can be treated as a private actor under antitrust law (North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners)

Jarod M. Bona

Abstract

Applying the Antitrust Laws to Anticompetitive State and Local Government Conduct* Update: The Supreme Court granted review in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC on March 3, 2014…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Applying the Antitrust Laws to Anticompetitive State and Local Government Conduct* Update: The Supreme Court granted review in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC on March 3, 2014…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Applying the Antitrust Laws to Anticompetitive State and Local Government Conduct* Update: The Supreme Court granted review in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC on March 3, 2014…

Key concepts: Certiorari, Law, State (computer science), Supreme court, Political science, State supreme court, Original jurisdiction, Computer science

The US Supreme Court grants petitions for writs of certiorari in a case dealing with the question whether a state regulatory board created by state law can be treated as a private actor under antitrust law (North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Why it matters

Key contribution

Method / approach

Main findings

Limitations

Applications

Available abstract

Related papers