Methods of Reasoning in Scientific Discovery
G. Nandasena, L. N. K. de Silva, K. K. W. A. S. Kumara
Abstract
Open-access reader
G. Nandasena, L. N. K. de Silva, K. K. W. A. S. Kumara
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this paper, we briefly discuss the forms of arguments and the methods of reasoning in scientific experiments, namely, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.We find that generalization is in human nature, and it is only a conception without any perception.The short comings of the applications of deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are analyzed using examples.It is observed that deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning methods are invalid in scientific reasoning.We discuss the vulnerability of the foundation of science that is based on the methods of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.We find that it is by abductive reasoning that theories are constructed to explain empirical observations.Abductive reasoning is only the reasoning method that can be applied for the observations in the empirical world.Finally, we conclude that the best and the most effective method of reasoning is the abductive reasoning for scientific experiments.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper, we briefly discuss the forms of arguments and the methods of reasoning in scientific experiments, namely, inductive reasoning, abductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.We find that generalization is in human nature, and it is only a conception without any perception.The short comings of the applications of deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning are analyzed using examples.It is observed that deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning methods are invalid in scientific reasoning.We discuss the vulnerability of the foundation of science that is based on the methods of inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.We find that it is by abductive reasoning that theories are constructed to explain empirical observations.Abductive reasoning is only the reasoning method that can be applied for the observations in the empirical world.Finally, we conclude that the best and the most effective method of reasoning is the abductive reasoning for scientific experiments.
Key concepts: Deductive reasoning, Abductive reasoning, Inductive reasoning, Scientific reasoning, Reasoning system, Qualitative reasoning, Model-based reasoning, Analytic reasoning