2018•arXiv (Cornell University)Open access

Non-forking w-good frames

Marcos Mazari Armida

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

We introduce the notion of a w-good $λ$-frame which is a weakening of Shelah's notion of a good $λ$-frame. Existence of a w-good $λ$-frame implies existence of a model of size $λ^{++}$. Tameness and amalgamation imply extension of a w-good $λ$-frame to larger models. As an application we show: $\textbf{Theorem}$ Suppose $2^λ< 2^{λ^{+}} < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $2^{λ^{+}} > λ^{++}$. If $I(K, λ) = I(K, λ^{+}) = 1 \leq I(K, λ^{++}) < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $K$ is $(λ, λ^+)$-tame, then $K_{λ^{+++}} \neq \emptyset$. The proof presented clarifies some of the details of the main theorem of [Sh576] and avoids using the heavy set-theoretic machinery of [Sh: h §VII] by replacing it with tameness.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We introduce the notion of a w-good $λ$-frame which is a weakening of Shelah's notion of a good $λ$-frame. Existence of a w-good $λ$-frame implies existence of a model of size $λ^{++}$. Tameness and amalgamation imply extension of a w-good $λ$-frame to larger models. As an application we show: $\textbf{Theorem}$ Suppose $2^λ< 2^{λ^{+}} < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $2^{λ^{+}} > λ^{++}$. If $I(K, λ) = I(K, λ^{+}) = 1 \leq I(K, λ^{++}) < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $K$ is $(λ, λ^+)$-tame, then $K_{λ^{+++}} \neq \emptyset$. The proof presented clarifies some of the details of the main theorem of [Sh576] and avoids using the heavy set-theoretic machinery of [Sh: h §VII] by replacing it with tameness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We introduce the notion of a w-good $λ$-frame which is a weakening of Shelah's notion of a good $λ$-frame. Existence of a w-good $λ$-frame implies existence of a model of size $λ^{++}$. Tameness and amalgamation imply extension of a w-good $λ$-frame to larger models. As an application we show: $\textbf{Theorem}$ Suppose $2^λ< 2^{λ^{+}} < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $2^{λ^{+}} > λ^{++}$. If $I(K, λ) = I(K, λ^{+}) = 1 \leq I(K, λ^{++}) < 2^{λ^{++}}$ and $K$ is $(λ, λ^+)$-tame, then $K_{λ^{+++}} \neq \emptyset$. The proof presented clarifies some of the details of the main theorem of [Sh576] and avoids using the heavy set-theoretic machinery of [Sh: h §VII] by replacing it with tameness.

Key concepts: Computer science, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-forking w-good frames — Research Paper | ScholarLens