2018Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in Adults with ALI and ARDS

Jennifer A. Scott, Vivek K. Moitra

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The ExPress Trial examined the role of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy targeting increased alveolar recruitment versus minimal alveolar distension in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although lung protective ventilation in ALI and ARDS showed significant mortality benefit, the optimal PEEP strategy was unclear. The primary outcome of the study was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, organ failure–free days, and barotrauma-related adverse events. Even though there was no significant difference in mortality between the two arms of the study, a significant difference was identified in ventilator-free days and organ failure–free days, which supported an increased recruitment PEEP strategy in the ALI/ARDS population and encouraged further examination.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ExPress Trial examined the role of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy targeting increased alveolar recruitment versus minimal alveolar distension in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although lung protective ventilation in ALI and ARDS showed significant mortality benefit, the optimal PEEP strategy was unclear. The primary outcome of the study was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, organ failure–free days, and barotrauma-related adverse events. Even though there was no significant difference in mortality between the two arms of the study, a significant difference was identified in ventilator-free days and organ failure–free days, which supported an increased recruitment PEEP strategy in the ALI/ARDS population and encouraged further examination.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ExPress Trial examined the role of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy targeting increased alveolar recruitment versus minimal alveolar distension in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although lung protective ventilation in ALI and ARDS showed significant mortality benefit, the optimal PEEP strategy was unclear. The primary outcome of the study was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ventilator-free days, organ failure–free days, and barotrauma-related adverse events. Even though there was no significant difference in mortality between the two arms of the study, a significant difference was identified in ventilator-free days and organ failure–free days, which supported an increased recruitment PEEP strategy in the ALI/ARDS population and encouraged further examination.

Key concepts: ARDS, Medicine, Positive end-expiratory pressure, Distension, Acute respiratory distress, Mechanical ventilation, Anesthesia, Ventilation (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Setting in Adults with ALI and ARDS — Research Paper | ScholarLens