2007ISEAS Publishing eBooksRequires access

10. The Dynamic Growth Order in East and Southeast Asia: Strategic Challenges and Prospects in the Post-9/11 Era

K. S. Nathan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: GLOBALIZATION AND POLITICAL STABILITY IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA The East Asian region as a whole (both Northeast and Southeast Asia) has evidenced a remarkable growth pattern since the late 1980s and early 1990s — a trend that was somewhat deflected by the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. Economic recovery and growth appear to have come back on track after the turn of the century. However, this most recent period of growth has being punctuated by the SARS epidemic (2003), and most recently, by the outbreak of bird flu in East Asia. Will these negative developments in the health sector affect overall economic growth and political stability as well as regional security? There is no doubt that the 11 September 2001 (9/11) terrorist attacks in the United States did and continues to have an impact on external and regional perceptions and policies regarding Asia-Pacific security. In any case, the more interesting feature of the post-9/11 scenario lies along two dimensions: First, the nature of initiatives and responses by East Asian (especially ASEAN) governments to the terrorist threat, and second, the glaring inability of international terrorism to overthrow or significantly alter the political, social, and territorial status quo in the region. Globalization understood in terms of its totalizing economic, political, social and cultural impact on human civilization is a fairly recent phenomenon that commenced with the advance of Western imperialism and territorial conquest in the latter half of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The non-Western world was arguably globalized by the imperial activities of Western powers and also Japan, whose emergence as a military-industrial power under the Meiji restoration gave the “Land of the Rising Sun” the same imperial energy and drive that had characterized the Europeans. Nevertheless, in the aftermath of the two world wars, the world community essentially accepted the nation-state process of globalization, and symbolized the post- World War II status quo by establishing the United Nations in 1945. Henceforth, unilateral ambitions were to be moderated by multi-lateral impulses through the machinery of international organization, and pacific settlements of disputes achieved through the medium of international law. Multi-lateralism in trade and economic matters was also endorsed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) system, whilst the 1944 Bretton-Woods agreement attempted to stabilize the international monetary system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: GLOBALIZATION AND POLITICAL STABILITY IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA The East Asian region as a whole (both Northeast and Southeast Asia) has evidenced a remarkable growth pattern since the late 1980s and early 1990s — a trend that was somewhat deflected by the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. Economic recovery and growth appear to have come back on track after the turn of the century. However, this most recent period of growth has being punctuated by the SARS epidemic (2003), and most recently, by the outbreak of bird flu in East Asia. Will these negative developments in the health sector affect overall economic growth and political stability as well as regional security? There is no doubt that the 11 September 2001 (9/11) terrorist attacks in the United States did and continues to have an impact on external and regional perceptions and policies regarding Asia-Pacific security. In any case, the more interesting feature of the post-9/11 scenario lies along two dimensions: First, the nature of initiatives and responses by East Asian (especially ASEAN) governments to the terrorist threat, and second, the glaring inability of international terrorism to overthrow or significantly alter the political, social, and territorial status quo in the region. Globalization understood in terms of its totalizing economic, political, social and cultural impact on human civilization is a fairly recent phenomenon that commenced with the advance of Western imperialism and territorial conquest in the latter half of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The non-Western world was arguably globalized by the imperial activities of Western powers and also Japan, whose emergence as a military-industrial power under the Meiji restoration gave the “Land of the Rising Sun” the same imperial energy and drive that had characterized the Europeans. Nevertheless, in the aftermath of the two world wars, the world community essentially accepted the nation-state process of globalization, and symbolized the post- World War II status quo by establishing the United Nations in 1945. Henceforth, unilateral ambitions were to be moderated by multi-lateral impulses through the machinery of international organization, and pacific settlements of disputes achieved through the medium of international law. Multi-lateralism in trade and economic matters was also endorsed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) system, whilst the 1944 Bretton-Woods agreement attempted to stabilize the international monetary system.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: GLOBALIZATION AND POLITICAL STABILITY IN EAST AND SOUTHEAST ASIA The East Asian region as a whole (both Northeast and Southeast Asia) has evidenced a remarkable growth pattern since the late 1980s and early 1990s — a trend that was somewhat deflected by the Asian Financial Crisis in the late 1990s. Economic recovery and growth appear to have come back on track after the turn of the century. However, this most recent period of growth has being punctuated by the SARS epidemic (2003), and most recently, by the outbreak of bird flu in East Asia. Will these negative developments in the health sector affect overall economic growth and political stability as well as regional security? There is no doubt that the 11 September 2001 (9/11) terrorist attacks in the United States did and continues to have an impact on external and regional perceptions and policies regarding Asia-Pacific security. In any case, the more interesting feature of the post-9/11 scenario lies along two dimensions: First, the nature of initiatives and responses by East Asian (especially ASEAN) governments to the terrorist threat, and second, the glaring inability of international terrorism to overthrow or significantly alter the political, social, and territorial status quo in the region. Globalization understood in terms of its totalizing economic, political, social and cultural impact on human civilization is a fairly recent phenomenon that commenced with the advance of Western imperialism and territorial conquest in the latter half of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The non-Western world was arguably globalized by the imperial activities of Western powers and also Japan, whose emergence as a military-industrial power under the Meiji restoration gave the “Land of the Rising Sun” the same imperial energy and drive that had characterized the Europeans. Nevertheless, in the aftermath of the two world wars, the world community essentially accepted the nation-state process of globalization, and symbolized the post- World War II status quo by establishing the United Nations in 1945. Henceforth, unilateral ambitions were to be moderated by multi-lateral impulses through the machinery of international organization, and pacific settlements of disputes achieved through the medium of international law. Multi-lateralism in trade and economic matters was also endorsed under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) system, whilst the 1944 Bretton-Woods agreement attempted to stabilize the international monetary system.

Key concepts: Order (exchange), Southeast asia, East Asia, Geography, Political science, History, Economy, Ancient history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
10. The Dynamic Growth Order in East and Southeast Asia: Strategic Challenges and Prospects in the Post-9/11 Era — Research Paper | ScholarLens