The Use of Different Diets for Feeding Rate and Growth of Shortfin Eel (Anguilla bicolor bicolor)
Nur Taufiq-Spj, S Sunaryo, A Wirasatria, Ibnu Pratikto, Dwi Haryo Ismunarti, M I Syaputra
Abstract
Open-access reader
Nur Taufiq-Spj, S Sunaryo, A Wirasatria, Ibnu Pratikto, Dwi Haryo Ismunarti, M I Syaputra
Abstract
Open-access reader
Growth and feed rate accompanied with proximate, texture and condition of the organism. The objective of this study was to obtain the effect of different diets to the feed rate and growth of shortfin eel Anguilla bicolor bicolor. The study used three replications and 3 treatments of different sources of feed diet during 84 days culture. The fish were fed with proximation of 2.2% wet basis d -1 (ratio of dry feed and water = 4 : 3). Initial density of approx. 15 kg seed stock of eel fingerling size (early elver) per m 3 water in the recirculating water system with ranging of means±SD of temperatures, pH and DO were 27.14±0.11 to 27.66±0.05 °C, 7.44±0.09 to 7.66±0.05, and 3.54±0.19 to 4.66±0.09 ppm respectively. The result shows that feeding rate has relation to lipid content of feed but not significantly different among treatments (α > 0.05), the highest FR shows by F 2 followed by F 3 and F 1 , where: F 1 = 2.04±0.07% d -1 and F 2 = 2.12±0.05% d -1 and F 3 = 2.10±0.06% d -1 ). Absolute growth of individuals and biomass were related to the protein content; the highest was F 1 followed by F 2 and F 3 . Growth margin F 1 , F 2 and F 3 of individual were 25 g (46%), 22 g (44%), and 15 g (27%) respectively, whilst biomass margin were 3,855 g (26%), 3,629 g (24%), and 2,834 g (18%) respectively during 70 days culture. Marginal mean of Individual-specific growth rate (SGRi) shows no significantly different (α > 0.05) between F 1 (0.53±0.05% d -1 ) and F 2 (0.52±0.01% d -1 ), but both of F 1 and F 2 have significantly different (α < 0.05) to F 3 (0.35±0.07% d -1 ). Biomass-specific growth rate (SGRb) also shows no significantly different (α > 0.05) between F 1 (0.33±0.09% d -1 ) and F 2 (0.31±0.02% d -1 ), but both of F 1 and F 2 have significantly different (α < 0.05) to F 3 (0.24±0.08% d -1 ).
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Growth and feed rate accompanied with proximate, texture and condition of the organism. The objective of this study was to obtain the effect of different diets to the feed rate and growth of shortfin eel Anguilla bicolor bicolor. The study used three replications and 3 treatments of different sources of feed diet during 84 days culture. The fish were fed with proximation of 2.2% wet basis d -1 (ratio of dry feed and water = 4 : 3). Initial density of approx. 15 kg seed stock of eel fingerling size (early elver) per m 3 water in the recirculating water system with ranging of means±SD of temperatures, pH and DO were 27.14±0.11 to 27.66±0.05 °C, 7.44±0.09 to 7.66±0.05, and 3.54±0.19 to 4.66±0.09 ppm respectively. The result shows that feeding rate has relation to lipid content of feed but not significantly different among treatments (α > 0.05), the highest FR shows by F 2 followed by F 3 and F 1 , where: F 1 = 2.04±0.07% d -1 and F 2 = 2.12±0.05% d -1 and F 3 = 2.10±0.06% d -1 ). Absolute growth of individuals and biomass were related to the protein content; the highest was F 1 followed by F 2 and F 3 . Growth margin F 1 , F 2 and F 3 of individual were 25 g (46%), 22 g (44%), and 15 g (27%) respectively, whilst biomass margin were 3,855 g (26%), 3,629 g (24%), and 2,834 g (18%) respectively during 70 days culture. Marginal mean of Individual-specific growth rate (SGRi) shows no significantly different (α > 0.05) between F 1 (0.53±0.05% d -1 ) and F 2 (0.52±0.01% d -1 ), but both of F 1 and F 2 have significantly different (α < 0.05) to F 3 (0.35±0.07% d -1 ). Biomass-specific growth rate (SGRb) also shows no significantly different (α > 0.05) between F 1 (0.33±0.09% d -1 ) and F 2 (0.31±0.02% d -1 ), but both of F 1 and F 2 have significantly different (α < 0.05) to F 3 (0.24±0.08% d -1 ).
Key concepts: Animal science, Growth rate, Biology, Fishery, Feed conversion ratio, Body weight, Mathematics, Endocrinology