2018Journal of Behavioral HealthRequires access

Sex without Condom and HIV Testing among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Comparative Study of Two Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas

Osaro O Mgbere, Sonia I. Arbona, Sharon Melville, Jonathon Poe, Shane U. Sheu, Salma A. Khuwaja, Zaida Lopez

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Condomless anal sex (CAS) accounts for most HIV infections among men who have sex with men (MSM). Knowledge of one’s HIV status through routine testing remains essential for reducing HIV transmission. We assessed the associations between demographic, behavioral, and prevention characteristics of MSM who engaged in CAS and HIV testing in the Dallas and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas in 2008 and 2014, and examined changes in CAS and HIV testing prevalence during this period. Methods: Data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance for 2008 and 2014 MSM cycles in Dallas and Houston were used for this analysis. We compared proportions of self-reported CAS and HIV testing and determined the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) using generalized estimating equations. Results: The overall adjusted prevalence of CAS among MSM in Dallas and Houston remained stable over time. MSM who had one sexual partner were 9 (aPR=9.21, 95%CI=3.83-14.91, p

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Condomless anal sex (CAS) accounts for most HIV infections among men who have sex with men (MSM). Knowledge of one’s HIV status through routine testing remains essential for reducing HIV transmission. We assessed the associations between demographic, behavioral, and prevention characteristics of MSM who engaged in CAS and HIV testing in the Dallas and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas in 2008 and 2014, and examined changes in CAS and HIV testing prevalence during this period. Methods: Data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance for 2008 and 2014 MSM cycles in Dallas and Houston were used for this analysis. We compared proportions of self-reported CAS and HIV testing and determined the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) using generalized estimating equations. Results: The overall adjusted prevalence of CAS among MSM in Dallas and Houston remained stable over time. MSM who had one sexual partner were 9 (aPR=9.21, 95%CI=3.83-14.91, p

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Condomless anal sex (CAS) accounts for most HIV infections among men who have sex with men (MSM). Knowledge of one’s HIV status through routine testing remains essential for reducing HIV transmission. We assessed the associations between demographic, behavioral, and prevention characteristics of MSM who engaged in CAS and HIV testing in the Dallas and Houston, Texas metropolitan areas in 2008 and 2014, and examined changes in CAS and HIV testing prevalence during this period. Methods: Data from the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance for 2008 and 2014 MSM cycles in Dallas and Houston were used for this analysis. We compared proportions of self-reported CAS and HIV testing and determined the adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) using generalized estimating equations. Results: The overall adjusted prevalence of CAS among MSM in Dallas and Houston remained stable over time. MSM who had one sexual partner were 9 (aPR=9.21, 95%CI=3.83-14.91, p

Key concepts: Condom, Metropolitan area, Men who have sex with men, Demography, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Medicine, Gerontology, Family medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sex without Condom and HIV Testing among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Comparative Study of Two Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Texas — Research Paper | ScholarLens