2018Utopian StudiesRequires access

“Glocalized” Utopia, Community-Building, and the Limits of Imagination

Steven Jay Schiffer

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT What happens when intentional communities break from lingering associations with socialism in favor of supposedly more savvy or self-conscious forms of utopianism? Attempts to grapple with globalizing neoliberalism, giving rise to “glocalized” utopia, highlight how ill-fitting the categorization of intentional communities as programmatic utopias is. Engagements with “everyday” utopianism in the face of an agency- and imagination-limiting globalizing neoliberalism suggest that in contemporary lived utopianism the everyday has become the program; contemporary utopianism in some North American intentional communities is defined by concerns for “raising consciousness” and “creating space”—efforts symbolic of the blending of programmatic and everyday utopianism. This article offers an ethnographic case study of this blended, glocalized form of utopianism, drawing on fieldwork to investigate how ecovillagers in the Yarrow Ecovillage make “everyday” life a site of self-conscious social reform. It then argues that glocalized utopia emerges when community aspirations for social reform confront neoliberal “recuperative capitalism.”

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT What happens when intentional communities break from lingering associations with socialism in favor of supposedly more savvy or self-conscious forms of utopianism? Attempts to grapple with globalizing neoliberalism, giving rise to “glocalized” utopia, highlight how ill-fitting the categorization of intentional communities as programmatic utopias is. Engagements with “everyday” utopianism in the face of an agency- and imagination-limiting globalizing neoliberalism suggest that in contemporary lived utopianism the everyday has become the program; contemporary utopianism in some North American intentional communities is defined by concerns for “raising consciousness” and “creating space”—efforts symbolic of the blending of programmatic and everyday utopianism. This article offers an ethnographic case study of this blended, glocalized form of utopianism, drawing on fieldwork to investigate how ecovillagers in the Yarrow Ecovillage make “everyday” life a site of self-conscious social reform. It then argues that glocalized utopia emerges when community aspirations for social reform confront neoliberal “recuperative capitalism.”

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT What happens when intentional communities break from lingering associations with socialism in favor of supposedly more savvy or self-conscious forms of utopianism? Attempts to grapple with globalizing neoliberalism, giving rise to “glocalized” utopia, highlight how ill-fitting the categorization of intentional communities as programmatic utopias is. Engagements with “everyday” utopianism in the face of an agency- and imagination-limiting globalizing neoliberalism suggest that in contemporary lived utopianism the everyday has become the program; contemporary utopianism in some North American intentional communities is defined by concerns for “raising consciousness” and “creating space”—efforts symbolic of the blending of programmatic and everyday utopianism. This article offers an ethnographic case study of this blended, glocalized form of utopianism, drawing on fieldwork to investigate how ecovillagers in the Yarrow Ecovillage make “everyday” life a site of self-conscious social reform. It then argues that glocalized utopia emerges when community aspirations for social reform confront neoliberal “recuperative capitalism.”

Key concepts: Utopia, Sociology, Neoliberalism (international relations), Aesthetics, Agency (philosophy), Everyday life, Capitalism, Socialism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Glocalized” Utopia, Community-Building, and the Limits of Imagination — Research Paper | ScholarLens