2018Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built EnvironmentRequires access

Hydrologic Modeling and Capital Cost Analysis of Low-Impact Development

Matthew G. Simpson, Larry A. Roesner

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Urban development substantially increases the rate and volume of stormwater runoff. Conventional stormwater management focuses on peak rate control while overlooking the increased volume of urban runoff. Low impact development (LID) is a land planning and stormwater management approach that seeks to manage runoff as close as possible to its source by reducing both the rate and volume of runoff. It has been hypothesized that LID can be used to restore predevelopment hydrology. This study investigates if LID practices alone can maintain predevelopment hydrology, as well as how much LID is required, and provides a capital cost analysis of LID practices. Several different stormwater management scenarios were evaluated with the EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) including two rainfall types and two soil types. Design storm and continuous simulation analyses were performed. Modeled LID elements include grassed swales, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and permeable pavement. Results show that LID can restore predevelopment site hydrology but requires extensive implementation of LID to manage the 100-year storm. Finally, the cost comparison indicates that the extra expense for a 100-year LID system may be as much as 40–65% more than the cost of a conventional drainage system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urban development substantially increases the rate and volume of stormwater runoff. Conventional stormwater management focuses on peak rate control while overlooking the increased volume of urban runoff. Low impact development (LID) is a land planning and stormwater management approach that seeks to manage runoff as close as possible to its source by reducing both the rate and volume of runoff. It has been hypothesized that LID can be used to restore predevelopment hydrology. This study investigates if LID practices alone can maintain predevelopment hydrology, as well as how much LID is required, and provides a capital cost analysis of LID practices. Several different stormwater management scenarios were evaluated with the EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) including two rainfall types and two soil types. Design storm and continuous simulation analyses were performed. Modeled LID elements include grassed swales, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and permeable pavement. Results show that LID can restore predevelopment site hydrology but requires extensive implementation of LID to manage the 100-year storm. Finally, the cost comparison indicates that the extra expense for a 100-year LID system may be as much as 40–65% more than the cost of a conventional drainage system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urban development substantially increases the rate and volume of stormwater runoff. Conventional stormwater management focuses on peak rate control while overlooking the increased volume of urban runoff. Low impact development (LID) is a land planning and stormwater management approach that seeks to manage runoff as close as possible to its source by reducing both the rate and volume of runoff. It has been hypothesized that LID can be used to restore predevelopment hydrology. This study investigates if LID practices alone can maintain predevelopment hydrology, as well as how much LID is required, and provides a capital cost analysis of LID practices. Several different stormwater management scenarios were evaluated with the EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) including two rainfall types and two soil types. Design storm and continuous simulation analyses were performed. Modeled LID elements include grassed swales, rain gardens, infiltration trenches, and permeable pavement. Results show that LID can restore predevelopment site hydrology but requires extensive implementation of LID to manage the 100-year storm. Finally, the cost comparison indicates that the extra expense for a 100-year LID system may be as much as 40–65% more than the cost of a conventional drainage system.

Key concepts: Low-impact development, Surface runoff, Storm Water Management Model, Swale, Stormwater, Bioretention, Environmental science, Stormwater management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hydrologic Modeling and Capital Cost Analysis of Low-Impact Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens