ScholarLens Back to search
2012•e-Competitions BulletinRequires access

The EU Court of Justice rules that the principle of effective judicial protection does not preclude the Commission from bringing on behalf of the European Union an action for damages before a national court (Europese Gemeenschap/Otis)

Magdalena Jozwiak

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Commission's double role in competition law enforcement: the Otis case* On November 6th, the Grand Chamber of the CJEU issued a ruling in Case C-199/11 (Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and…

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Commission's double role in competition law enforcement: the Otis case* On November 6th, the Grand Chamber of the CJEU issued a ruling in Case C-199/11 (Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and…

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Commission's double role in competition law enforcement: the Otis case* On November 6th, the Grand Chamber of the CJEU issued a ruling in Case C-199/11 (Europese Gemeenschap v Otis NV and…

Key concepts: Damages, Law, Political science, Commission, Enforcement, Economic Justice, European union, European commission

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The EU Court of Justice rules that the principle of effective judicial protection does not preclude the Commission from bringing on behalf of the European Union an action for damages before a national court (Europese Gemeenschap/Otis) — Research Paper | ScholarLens