Chemical Signatures of Melt–Rock Interaction in the Root of a Magmatic Arc

Identification of melt-rock interaction during melt flux through crustal rocks is limited to field relationships and microstructural evidence, with little consideration given to characterising the geochemical signatures of this process.We examine the mineral and whole-rock geochemistry of four distinct styles of melt-rock interaction during melt flux through the Pembroke Granulite, a gabbroic gneiss from the Fiordland magmatic arc root, New Zealand.Spatial distribution, time-integrated flux of melt and stress field vary between each melt flux style.Whole-rock metasomatism is not detected in three of the four melt flux styles.The mineral assemblage and major element mineral composition in modified rocks are dictated by inferred P-T conditions, as in sub-solidus metamorphic systems, and time-integrated volumes of melt flux.Heterogeneous mineral major and trace element compositions are linked to low time-integrated volumes of melt flux, which inhibits widespread modification and equilibration.Amphibole and clinozoisite in modified rocks have igneous-like REE patterns, formed by growth and/or recrystallisation in the presence of melt and large equilibration volumes provided by the grain boundary network of melt.Heterogeneities in mineral REE compositions are linked to localisation of melt flux by deformation and resulting smaller equilibration volumes and/or variation in the composition of the fluxing melt.When combined with microstructural evidence for the former presence of melt, the presence of igneous-like mineral REE chemical signatures in a metamorphic rock are proposed as powerful indicators of melt-rock interaction during melt flux.Key words: amphibolite; hydration; lower crust; melt-rock interaction; porous melt flow and/or injection and crystallisation (e.g.Tait & Harley, 1988;Collins & Sawyer, 1996;Sawyer et al., 1999), or at the axes of spreading oceanic ridges (e.g.Korenaga & Kelemen, 1997;Saal & Van Orman, 2004;Lissenberg & Dick, 2008;Lissenberg et al., 2013).In contrast, little consideration is given to geochemical signatures produced during the migration of melt through the lower continental crust.Melt-rock interaction in crustal rocks is rarely documented because of the inherent complexity of crustal rock types and melt compositions, and a lack of criteria for identification of the former flux of melt.Evidence for melt-rock interaction in the field may take the form of distributed or narrow zones of modification, such as V