1987bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Federalism and Fundamental Rights: The Ninth Amendment

Calvin R. Massey

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Justices Harlan and White each concurred separately in the Court's judgment.Id. at 499, 502.Justices Black and Stewart dissented.Id. at 507, 527.Justice Douglas authored the Court's opinion, in which he dared not venture as far as Justice Goldberg, preferring merely to include the ninth amendment among the provisions of the Bill of Rights that have "penumbras, formed by emanations from [such] guarantees."Id. at 484.Only seven Supreme Court cases prior to Griswold dealt in any fashion with the ninth amendment: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 492-93 (1957); Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co., 333 U.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Justices Harlan and White each concurred separately in the Court's judgment.Id. at 499, 502.Justices Black and Stewart dissented.Id. at 507, 527.Justice Douglas authored the Court's opinion, in which he dared not venture as far as Justice Goldberg, preferring merely to include the ninth amendment among the provisions of the Bill of Rights that have "penumbras, formed by emanations from [such] guarantees."Id. at 484.Only seven Supreme Court cases prior to Griswold dealt in any fashion with the ninth amendment: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 492-93 (1957); Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co., 333 U.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Justices Harlan and White each concurred separately in the Court's judgment.Id. at 499, 502.Justices Black and Stewart dissented.Id. at 507, 527.Justice Douglas authored the Court's opinion, in which he dared not venture as far as Justice Goldberg, preferring merely to include the ninth amendment among the provisions of the Bill of Rights that have "penumbras, formed by emanations from [such] guarantees."Id. at 484.Only seven Supreme Court cases prior to Griswold dealt in any fashion with the ninth amendment: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 492-93 (1957); Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co., 333 U.

Key concepts: Ninth, Federalism, Amendment, Political science, Law, Law and economics, Economics, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Federalism and Fundamental Rights: The Ninth Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens