Interventionism in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From the Berlin congress to the Deyton agreement
Tamara B. Dakic
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tamara B. Dakic
Abstract
Open-access reader
In this paper interventionism is discussed through two comparative periods related to Bosnia and Herzegovina - the Austro-Hungarian occupation and war at the end of the 20th century - in the light of Balkanism as a leitmotif and justification for the Just War. Relevant statements of significant political actors from the mentioned periods are given and analyzed in the service of further evaluation of interventionism. The mechanism of soft interventionism is shown on the example of national identity management, while the third part summarizes the correlation between interventionism and the question of sovereignty.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper interventionism is discussed through two comparative periods related to Bosnia and Herzegovina - the Austro-Hungarian occupation and war at the end of the 20th century - in the light of Balkanism as a leitmotif and justification for the Just War. Relevant statements of significant political actors from the mentioned periods are given and analyzed in the service of further evaluation of interventionism. The mechanism of soft interventionism is shown on the example of national identity management, while the third part summarizes the correlation between interventionism and the question of sovereignty.
Key concepts: Interventionism (politics), Sovereignty, Politics, Political science, Political economy, International relations, Economics, Law