2017•ПОЛИТЕИАOpen access

Interventionism in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From the Berlin congress to the Deyton agreement

Tamara B. Dakic

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In this paper interventionism is discussed through two comparative periods related to Bosnia and Herzegovina - the Austro-Hungarian occupation and war at the end of the 20th century - in the light of Balkanism as a leitmotif and justification for the Just War. Relevant statements of significant political actors from the mentioned periods are given and analyzed in the service of further evaluation of interventionism. The mechanism of soft interventionism is shown on the example of national identity management, while the third part summarizes the correlation between interventionism and the question of sovereignty.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper interventionism is discussed through two comparative periods related to Bosnia and Herzegovina - the Austro-Hungarian occupation and war at the end of the 20th century - in the light of Balkanism as a leitmotif and justification for the Just War. Relevant statements of significant political actors from the mentioned periods are given and analyzed in the service of further evaluation of interventionism. The mechanism of soft interventionism is shown on the example of national identity management, while the third part summarizes the correlation between interventionism and the question of sovereignty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper interventionism is discussed through two comparative periods related to Bosnia and Herzegovina - the Austro-Hungarian occupation and war at the end of the 20th century - in the light of Balkanism as a leitmotif and justification for the Just War. Relevant statements of significant political actors from the mentioned periods are given and analyzed in the service of further evaluation of interventionism. The mechanism of soft interventionism is shown on the example of national identity management, while the third part summarizes the correlation between interventionism and the question of sovereignty.

Key concepts: Interventionism (politics), Sovereignty, Politics, Political science, Political economy, International relations, Economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interventionism in Bosnia and Herzegovina: From the Berlin congress to the Deyton agreement — Research Paper | ScholarLens